Laserfiche WebLink
• LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />Aptil 18, 1996 <br />Page 13 <br />1. The erosion control measures must be constructed at the initial stages of construction <br /> and be maintained until all areas altered on the site have been restored. <br />2. The applicant should be advised that a iVPDES Construction permit is also required <br /> from the MPCA. <br />3. At the entryways on to the site, rock filter dikes being a minimum of 2 feet in height <br /> and having maximum side slope of four to one must be constructed. These rock filter <br /> dikes will enable construction traffic to enter the site and also provide an erosion <br /> control facility. The rock dikes must be continually maintained during the construction <br /> phase of the project. <br />4. Street sweeping must be undertaken and completed on an as needed basis. <br />5. Upon completion of construction and restoration of disturbed areas, the permit <br /> application is responsible for the removal of all erosion control measures installed <br /> throughout the site. <br />6. A detailed storm sewer plan must be submitted for review and approval. The outlet <br /> from the water quality basins must be designed to provide skimming of floatable <br /> materials. The storm sewer system that are to be located along lot lines between <br /> proposed structures must be designed with pipe and/or pipe and surface overt]ow <br />• capacity for the 100-year frequency storm discharge. <br />onstruction and <br />f <br />i <br />i <br />l <br />t <br />h <br />i <br />7. ages o <br />c <br />s <br />n <br />t <br />a <br />e <br />The water quality basins must be constructed at t <br /> be functional during the site grading portion of the project. <br />8. The low floor elevation of structures to be located adjacent to storm water <br /> detention/water quality basins and wetland areas must be established a minimum of <br /> one foot above the calculated 100-year frequency flood elevation of these facilities.. <br />9. Because of the size of the proposed project, grading activities must be phased to <br /> minimize the area altered and subject to erosion. <br />10. The LRRWMO being the LGU administering the requirements of the 1991 Wetland <br /> Conservation Act requires that the developer provide verification, provided either by <br /> the Anoka Conservation District or the engineering advisor to the LR.RWMO, of the <br /> wetland limits on the site as delineated by the developer's consultant. <br />- Vote: 4 ayes, 0 nays. Motion carried. <br />Weaver asked if there are any concerns relative to elevations. Obermeyer stated he had none. <br />Weaver asked if the pazk is being created within the wetland area. Jankowski noted it is a DNR <br />protected wetland and the City was going to designate the trail area as pazk but because of the <br />delineation, the entire azea became designated as pazk. He explained the only construction in the park <br />would be to construct a path or benches but there will be no active use such as ball diamonds. <br />• Haas questioned who verified the boundaries of the wetland. Obermeyer noted the DNR would <br />establish the static Ordinary High Water (OHW) elevation. Jankowski stated an engineer was used <br />to identify wetlands and perhaps documentation of wetland delineation should be submitted. Haas <br />noted there will be a need to verify the delineation was properly determined. He stated when this was <br />discussed previously the concern that the delineation is being done by the developer's engineer so it <br />