Laserfiche WebLink
• LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />July 17, 1997 <br />Page 2 <br />Administrative Secretary was asked to revise the Addendum to indicate an expiration of January 31, <br />2000. The revised Addendum will be considered at the August 21, 1997 meeting.) <br />Weaver noted that in looking at the 1997 budget for the current year, including a $10,000 assessment <br />to member cities, a projection would indicate no deficit this yeaz. He commented it maybe premature <br />to consider budgeting a larger deficit since it appears the LRRWMO will live within its 1997 budget <br />even though. a $7,700 deficit was projected. <br />Knutson commented on the positive impact from the number of grants which were applied for and <br />received which resulted in an increase to reserves ($20,000 to $21,000). <br />Weaver pointed out the anticipated budget for legal, administrative, and engineering expenses which <br />have not been used each year, resulting in building a reserve. He noted this has been possible because <br />the attomey is not attending monthly meetings and engineering expenses aze being charged back to <br />the pernvttee. In addition, almost $3,000 per year is being earned in interest. <br />Knutson inquired if the projects included. in the Plan implementation will result in the need for <br />• increased assessments or be paid from the fund balance. Jankowski stated he believes the projects <br />for the first several years can be funded from reserves. He suggested revising the engineering and <br />legal budgets to more accurately reflect the costs being incurred. <br />Discussion occurred regazding whether the attomey will be involved in review of the Plan, once <br />adopted. It was noted the attorney may be involved with updating the joint powers agreement (in <br />the future) but the Plan should be somewhat of a "boiler plate" document and not require additional <br />legal review. <br />Weaver inquired regarding the purpose of this drag. Knutson stated it is intended to start discussion <br />with member cities so the assessment can be included in their individual budget. Weaver asked if the <br />administrative, legal and engineering amounts aze reduced, would the revenue side also be equally <br />adjusted. Jankowski stated it could be used, to some degree, to offset assessments. <br />Ottensmann stated he agrees those line items could be reduced which will result in the assessments <br />also being reduced. <br />Knutson stated the costs for Plan implementation need to be known since it could substantially change <br />the fund balance over the next few years. Weaver concurred this issue needs to be addressed since <br />once the Plan is adopted, the LRRWMO is committed to complete those projects. <br />• Jankowski proposed the line items be adjusted to be consistent with expenses experienced and the <br />deficit be reduced by a nominal amoum ($10,000). Knutson stated once the amount is known for <br />Plan implementation, the Boazd needs to be comfortable with the remaining net operational surplus. <br />Weaver stated it appears the assessment to the cities will not be increased for 1998. Knutson <br />explained how the property evaluation may impact the level of the assessment. <br />