Laserfiche WebLink
underway. This document will assess runway requirements and implementation <br />feasibility for Lake Elmo. <br />The airport's navigational and visual aids include an NDB approach to <br />Rumvay 3. Runway, 3/21 is also equipped with MII2Ls. Other airport NAVAIDs <br />include an airport beacon, wind sock, and a wind tee. REIIs are recommended for <br />all runway ends. A PAPI is recommended for Runway 3. <br />(4) lea Airspace <br />Lake Ehno Airport does not affect the other airports in the. region during <br />VFR conditions. The existing IFR approach procedure for Runway 3, using an IVDB <br />located 8Z nautical miles southwest of the airport, conflicts with St. Paul Downtown <br />Airport's IIS approach to Rumvay 32 and NDB approach to Rumvay 30. Providing <br />Lake Elmo Airport with a precision approach would be feasible if the primary <br />procedure would be to Runway 13/31; this would provide compatibility with St. Paul <br />Downtown and Minneapolis~t. Paul International traffic flows. It is unlikely, <br />however, that a suitable nutway length can be obtained for a precision approach. It <br />is rernmmended that a nonprecision approach be investigated for Runway 13/31. <br />(5) wort Envirotie <br />Lake Ehao's land ernetope rnnsists of 600 acres. Access to the airport is <br />provided by County Road 15, which also comprises the western border of the airport. <br />The land use surrounding the airport is primarily agricultural, except for the Village <br />of Lake Elmo located approximately one mile to the west and a residential area <br />located one mile to the east. Access between Lake Elmo Airport and the <br />Minneapolis-St. Paul area is provided via Interstate 94, which is located <br />approximately three miles south of the airport. <br /> <br />V-85 <br />