Laserfiche WebLink
5050.4 3/21/80 <br />6 An opportunity shall be provided for early public review <br />of base floodplain encroachments. This may be accomplished through existing <br />public involvement procedures as indicated in paragraphs 45, 48e, and 49. <br />Any public bearing presentations shall include identification of encroach- <br />ments. If one or more of the alternatives under consideration include <br />significant floodplain encroachments, any public notices, notices offering, the <br />opportunity for a public hearing, public hearing notices, and notices of the <br />availability of environmental assessments shall make reference to that fact. <br />(h) If no significant encroachment within a base floodplain is <br />involved as defined in subparagraph (g)3 above, it may be assumed that there <br />would be no significant floodplain impact. No further analysis and no special <br />floodplains findings are necessary. <br />(i) If a significant encroachment is involved which could result <br />in either loss of life or substantial future damage or both but would not <br />result in notable adverse impacts on natural and beneficial floodplain values, <br />these circumstances do not by themselves require the preparation of an environ- <br />mental impact statement. CEQ 1508.14 states that "...economic or social <br />effects are not intended by themselves to require preparation of an environ- <br />mental impact statement." While further consideration on the floodplains <br />aspects of the proposed action would be prudent on the part of the sponsor and <br />the FAA before proceeding, a finding of no significant impact is the <br />appropriate action choice in this circumstance assuming there are no other <br />significant environmental impacts associated with the action. The findings <br />delineated in paragraph 94b(6) would be required for the project decision. <br />(j) If a significant encroachment is involved which would result <br />in notable adverse impacts on natural and beneficial floodplain values, this <br />would require the preparation of an environmental impact statement and further <br />analysis as described in paragraph 85.1. <br />(13) Coastal Zone Management Program. <br />(a) Detailed procedures for determining Federal consistency <br />with approved coastal zone management programs are contained in the National <br />Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Regulations (15 C.F.R. Part 930). <br />The sections most relevant to airport actions are subpart D, Consistency for <br />Activities Requiring a Federal License or Permit, and subpart F, Consistency <br />for Federal Assistance to State and Local Governments. If there is no <br />approved state program, the instructions below do not apply. However, the <br />environmental assessment shall in any case consider impacts on coastal areas. <br />This may be done through analyses performed under other impact categories <br />(e.g., water quality, biotic communities, construction impacts) as appropriate, <br />using the thresholds established under these respective categories. If <br />thresholds of significance are exceeded, a more detailed coastal area and/or <br />marine analysis may be necessary in an environmental impact statement. Coastal <br />areas may also be designated as wetlands and require the special treatment <br />described in paragraph 47e(11) above. <br />Chap 5 <br />Par 47 <br />