Laserfiche WebLink
3/21/80 5050.4 <br />• <br />(b) The principal means used to determine if a proposed Federal <br />action is consistent with an approved coastal zone management program is <br />through the A-95 clearinghouse review process as described in paragraph 48. <br />To the extent possible, the information provided shall include a detailed <br />description of the proposed action and any associated facilities sufficient <br />to permit an assessment of their probable coastal zone effects and consistency <br />with the provisions of the approved coastal zone management program. If, <br />through the A-95 process, the state coastal zone management agency does not <br />object to the proposed action, no further action is necessary. The environ- <br />mental assessment shall document the result of such coordination. <br />(c) Approval of airport layout plans could by definition in the <br />NOAA Regulations be a Federal permitting action subject to subpart D. Unless <br />this activity has specifically been identified in a given state's coastal zone <br />management program or unless a state coastal zone management agency specifi- <br />cally advises the sponsor and FAA through A-95 or review of an environmental <br />impact statement that an airport layout plan approval action would signifi- <br />cantly affect a coastal zone, subpart D of the NOAA regulations will not <br />apply and no further action is needed. If subpart D applies, the applicant <br />must provide more specific information including a consistency certificate, <br />and the state agency has up to six months within which to register objection. <br />(d) If the state coastal zone management agency objects to the <br />proposed action on the basis of failure to provide sufficient information, it <br />must describe the nature of the information needed to determine consistency <br />with the coastal zone management program. Otherwise, any objection must <br />identify how the proposed action is inconsistent with specific elements of <br />the management program and alternative measures which, if adopted, would <br />permit consistency. The objection shall also provide information on the right <br />to appeal to the Secretary of Commerce pursuant to subpart H of the NOAA <br />Regulations. Such appeal must be made within 30 days of notice of the <br />objection. When an objection has been raised which cannot be satisfied by <br />providing additional information or otherwise be resolved through informal <br />discussions to avoid the need for an appeal as provided in subpart H, the <br />sponsor may file a notice of appeal as soon as possible and notify the FAA <br />accordingly. The action shall not be approved unless such an objection is <br />successfully appealed. <br />(e) As a result of an appeal, the Secretary of Commerce may <br />find that the action is "consistent with the objectives and purposes of the <br />[Coastal Zone Management] Act" and permissible even though it is inconsistent <br />with a state's management program. Such finding may be made on the basis that <br />the action: <br />1 Furthers one or more of the competing national <br />objectives or purposes defined in the Act; <br />2 Will not cause adverse impacts on the natural resources <br />of the coastal zone substantial enough to outweigh its contribution to the <br />national interest; <br />Chap 5 <br />Par 47 <br />Page 53 <br />