My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 10/27/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2009
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 10/27/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:53:44 PM
Creation date
9/28/2010 9:39:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
10/27/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Wise asked if the traffic numbers were based on the 2008 numbers <br />Jack Corkle, Anoka County Sr. Transportation Planner, responded there was a slight decrease in <br />traffic between 2008 and 2007 due to the economy and the price of gasoline. She stated the <br />models were based on how much the community was proposed to grow. She indicated the <br />County roads were generally updated for traffic every year or every other year and there had <br />been a recent count done. <br />Councilmember Elvig asked if a roundabout could be put in. <br />Ms. Corkle responded the County was not in favor of multi-lane roundabouts, but there would <br />still be hard channelization even if a roundabout were put in. <br />Mr. Orcutt noted the County also would need the land for a roundabout and Casey's would <br />probably need to be taken out. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated he would rather see Casey's being taken out and paid for their property <br />than killing their business. <br />Councilmember Look asked if all of the accidents areas would be taken care of with stoplights. <br />Mr. Orcutt responded not necessarily. He noted this was a mobility issue and not necessarily a <br />crash issue. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated while there was a benefit to the project, the deficit had to be looked at also. <br />Councilmember Wise asked if the point was to reduce the speeds on County Roads. <br />Ms. Corkle responded that was how the County constructed the County roads. <br />Councilmember Wise asked when hard channelization went in and it decreased business, was <br />there a reduction in property values for taxes for that business. <br />Mr. Orcutt responded he did not know of any provision for a reduction in taxes, but the County <br />has determinedthat aright-in right-out was a reasonable access. <br />Councilmember Dehen asked if the objective was to create an arterial to relieve pressure from <br />Highway 10. He stated if this project was not done, would the improvements be made to <br />Highway 10. <br />Ms. Corkle responded both Bunker Lake Boulevard and Highway 10 needed improvements, but <br />part of the intention was to relieve some traffic off Highway 10. <br />Councilmember Elvig expressed concern that there would be U-turns being made when traffic <br />was travelling at 55 mph. <br />City Council Work Session /October 27, 2009 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.