Laserfiche WebLink
! <br />! <br /> <br />Site Plan Review: Evergreen Point <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />April 26, 2002, Revised May 23, 2002 <br /> <br />private street policy establishes a 25 foot structure setback from curb of private streets. <br />Evergreen Point meets all of the minimum setbacks ih effect, except the 35 foot setback from <br />the fight-of-way of public streets. You have received a var/anco to have a 25-foot structure <br />setback from the right-of-way at the May 2, 2002 Board of Adjustment. <br /> <br />Densitw' The site plan shows a total of 110 units on 24.1 acres, which equates to a gross <br />density of 4.56 units per acre. Factoring out the major road right-of-way (T.H. ,~-47 and <br />Alpine Dr/ye) and the wetlands, the net density is 6.8 units per acre. <br /> <br />Access: Streets and access' have been reviewed as a part of.the Preliminary Plat appro'~al <br />process. Ptease refer to City Staff Preliminary Ptar Review Leper dared April 26, 2002, <br />l~.evised May 23, 2002. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />Gradin~ and Drainage: The grading plan is being reviewed as a part of the Prelimiha~/Prat <br />~.pproval process. Ptease refer to City Staff Preliminary Prat Review Letter dated Apr// 26, <br />2002, Revised May 2_3, 2002. <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />ii. <br /> <br />]LEU Number: The City has enacted a quarterly drainage utility charge that is applicable to <br />the proposed development. The total quarterly drainage utility charge for the proposed <br />townhouse development will be provided at the time the City receives the necessary <br />ii~'ormation. <br /> <br />I,andscaping: A Landscape Plan has been submitted that is generally acceptable and meets <br />t. ae City's minimum standards. City Staff will continue to review the plan and make comments <br />r,~garding the plan at a ~'uture dare. As referenced in. the Preliminary Plat review letter, the <br /> andscaping Ptan Will need to be modified to also identify tree removal limits, or an addendum <br /> the Grading Plan will be required to identify both ex. isting tree stands and removal limits. <br /> <br />~¢reening: City Code requires a l 5 foot wide screened buffer area when a multiple family <br />dwelling unit abuts a single family or a duplex district. The most northwesterly towahome <br />s',:ructure abuts the southeast comer of Wildlife Sanctuary, a single family residential <br />nsighborhood. The site plan identifies substantial tree ~owth between the northwest <br />townhome structure and Wildlife Sanctuary. k also appears that there is substantial tree cover <br />ir. this area that adequately addresses the screening requirement provided they are preserved <br />d'~ring construction. <br /> <br />S~>und Mitignti.o..n.: [t is the City's responsibility to take reasonable measures to ensure <br />compatibility between [and use and traffic noise generated fi-om an adjacent highway. The City <br />has engaged the services of SRF to do a traffic noise level study on several pending residential <br /> <br />-313- <br /> <br /> <br />