My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/23/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 04/23/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:07:19 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 8:42:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/23/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />payment. The City was also requesting an easement for possible future trail purposes parallel to <br />T.H. #47. <br /> <br />Principal Engineer Olson noted that he did discuss the recommendation of MnDOT regarding the <br />northerly access and explained that it was the City recommendation that the access be placed in <br />an area where the turn would be 90 degrees. MnDOT explained that they were only making a <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson inquired if staff felt that the 90 degree turn would be safer. <br /> <br />Principal Engineer Olson replied yes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if the six foot fence will be located along the highway. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied yes, unless it is determined that further sound <br />mitigation is necessary and approved by the City Attorney. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson questioned the statement that the "grading plan is generally <br />acceptable". <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson explained that ACCAP will need to work in conjunction with the property <br />to the south regarding the grading. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson noted that the number of units and in what configuration differs in the <br />case presented to the Council and the City staffreview letter dated March 20, 2002. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that when the City approved the Katnis property they allowed <br />the building of a public street through the property and some private streets to service groups of <br />buildings and thought of them in terms of driveways. Then The Ponds development came <br />forward with a townhome development and they were not proposing individual driveways as <br />private drives, but collector streets as private drives. He inquired as to how far the City is going <br />to go with private drives. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that in regards to the ACCAP development they are proposing one <br />private street to facilitate a better development on the site. <br /> <br />Councihnember Zimmerman stated that Councilmember Kurak had stated in her campaign <br />material that she would not vote for low income housing and now she is doing exactly that. He <br />stated that that was a bad decision on Councilmember Kurak's part. He inquired if it would be <br />possible fbr a fire truck to make the sharp turnl <br /> <br />Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler replied that the streets met all of the City's road <br />standards. <br /> <br />City Council/March 26, 2002 <br /> Page I7 of 25 <br /> <br />-35- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.