Agenda - Council - 11/12/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I i I I I I I Councilmember Hendriksen stated that the easement would be a location between Alpine Drive and Jarvis Street, which could be the resolution to the problem without having to acquire land. Councilmember Zimmerman stated that at a minimum if'the City Paid for the easement they should have that money coming back. Mayor Gamec requested that staff research that information and bring it back to the Council. Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman, seconded by Councilmember Hendriksen, to table action. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Zimmerman, Hendriksen, Anderson, and Kurak. Voting No: None. Case #4: Request for a ConditionaI Use permit to Exceed Accessory Building SiZe Restrictions: Case of David and Sandra Shappell Applicant withdrew their application. -Case #5: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Exceed Accessory Building Size Restrictions: Case of Cindi and Michael Heying Community Development Director Frolik stated that the City received an application from Cindi and Michael Heying for a conditional use permit to exceed the accessory bUilding size restrictions established in City Code on the property located at 17211 Willemite St NW. The subject property is approximately 0.95 acres (41,364.77 square feet) in size and is located outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Under City Code, parcels between 14,880 sq. ft. and 43,559 sq. ft. can have up tO 1,488 square feet of'accessory building space. The proposed building will be 1,120 square feet (28' x 40') in size. Coupled with the existing garage (440 sq. ft.), the applicants will have 1,560 sq. ft. in accessory buildings. ThiS results in an overage of 72 square feet. The applicants would like to exceed the 1,488 square feet restriction in order to construct a detached accessory building that would accommodate the Storage of a classic car and other personal equipment/vehicles. The proposed detached accessory building will be located in the side yard to the north of the principal dwelling and just south of the transmission line easement. The proposed accessory building location exceeds the ten (10) foot side yard and five (5) foot rear yard setbacks established in the Rural Developing Bulk Standardk. The applicants stated that a second driveway would be installed. The applicants also applied for a variance to the front yard setback of forty (40) feet (which results in the accessory Structure being located thirty-three [33] from the front property line). The case was presented to the Board of Adjustments on October 3, 2002, and was approved. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the request on October 3, 2002. There was no citizen opposition during the City Council/October 22, 2002 Page 19 of 36 -137-