My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/09/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 07/09/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:09:26 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 2:05:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/09/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-52- <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman asked where they were in th/s request. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated they discussed this in March and Mr. Kurak brought forth a letter <br />requesting an additional 60 days. He stated several letters from Mr. Kurak asked the Council to <br />not act on th_is pending work with the neighbors to discuss these land use issues. He stated since <br />March 12, there had been two to three letters extending this in thirty-day increments. To date <br />they did not have a letter extending this another 30 days so in order to comply with the sixty day <br />rule, MS 1599, they need to act on this tonight. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman asked what would happen if they did not act on this tonight. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich statecL~that if they did not act on this tonight, based on the statute, the <br />Kurak application would be:i~ei~_ecl approved because they would have violated the Statute. <br /> <br /> Gamec stated:'~:/~, either waTi(;because of a letter requesting that group not to continue, the <br />Mayor <br />Council would need G:take actip~,~tSthe ~eeting. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich st~J~'t~ii~s n°~(:}letter requesting the group not to <br /> continue. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec asked if they co'id con~ie~Xb2~eet. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated they :~uld.~H'e. Ti~d}~iW Ad~nistrator No,an if they had a <br /> <br />Ci~ Administrator No,an stated Mr. Kurak w~:?going::(0;~bmit the le~er until ~e request was <br />put on the agenda to vote; he rehsed to submi~:"~ho~ tetter. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated ~at in order to be in compli~ce wi~e Mimesota State statute, <br />the Council needed to vote on t~s to~ght. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendfiksen showed a drawing of the pI~}~¢elopment. He stated he did not <br />a~end ~y of the meetings but had the meeting minU~s. He stated there was not <br />ore, helming consensus that some people suggested that there might be in te~s of general <br />accept~ce of t~s. He stated the dia~am did not match with the request that was made in te~s <br />of what potion they were requesting the land use ch~ge for. He stated it seemed approphate <br />· at if t~s kept ch~ng,-they should not consider t~s to be pa~ of ~e fou~een requests that <br />were ~dfathered in last ye~ ~d actually follow the process that exists in mak~g the land use <br />change. Councilmember Hendfiksen pointed out that he believed ~s was for the entire p~cel, <br />or at least a potion of the p~ce[, not just ~enty odd acres ~at were depicted ~ the drawing so <br />he believed action was approphate. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated they needed to take action on this no matter what. <br /> <br />City Council/June 25, 2002 <br /> Page 6 of 33 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.