My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/12/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 02/12/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:04:08 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 3:47:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/12/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
property to R-1 Urban Residential to facilitate development of the property at urban standards. <br />The City Council introduced the rezoning ordinance on December 11, 2001 and approved the <br />2001 Comprehensive Plan on December 18, 2001. The 2001 Comprehensive Plan expands the <br />MUSA boundary to include the subject property. The plat area is 9.7 acres. The subdivision is <br />proposing to plat 17 new single-family parcels and one existing homestead for a total of 18 <br />single-family lots. Net density (exclusive of Hwy. #47 right-of-way) has been established at 1.9 <br />units per acre. The 18 lots will receive public access from the extension of 158t~ Lane into the <br />plat from River Pines 2nd Addition to the west. Currently, 158t~ Lane dead ends on the west <br />boundary of the proposed plat and this is a public safety concern since the length of this dead end <br />is greater than 600 feet. Lith/um Street NW would be extended from the south to the north <br />boundary of the plat. A cul-de-sac would extend east off of Lithium .to service the remainder of <br />the lots. The existing homestead will have access to the cul-de-sac. The plat has been forwarded <br />to Mn/DOT for review and it is,,expected that they will suggest that the two existing driveways <br />onto T.H. #47 from the ex~i~ri'g'h~¢estead be abandoned and that right of access along T.H. ~ht7 <br />be dedicated to the Sta:~el~:~ Th~?~roposed cul-de-sac does not exceed the 600-foot length <br />restriction. All of thqji!i4{S meet the/~ig,800 s~tuare foO.t lot area and 80 foot 10t width (measured at <br />the building setbackT~[equirem~? ~ough denSity transitioning is currently not'required <br />between neighborhood~'~'f:~ff~'g'.,~:i;~b~, the Developer has provided for two one-acre lots <br />on the common property 1~[ 'w~7'lar~!~xisting rural lots to the north. Sidewalks will be <br />required along 158~' and Li.~,*:~tn Streets. ~5-The Park and Recreation Commission met on <br />September 20, 2001 and reco~ende~:?~:~:¢rk,~;~ dedication be satisfied by the dedication of a <br />20-foot trail easement running para~l to State #47 and a cash contribution. The <br />Commission also recommended thai?~e <br /> <br />northerly limits of River Pines 5~h <br />of trail construction outside the limits of <br />fees due on the plat. The Planning <br />public hearing regarding the proposed <br /> <br />uired to pave a trail running from the <br />limits of Apple Ridge, with the cost <br />being credited towards trail <br />a_~_ary 3, 2002, and conducted the <br />~bre were no written or verbal <br /> <br />comments submitted at the hearing. The ¥~ommended preliminary plat <br />approval. ~"~ ' <br /> <br /> · . : - . ~ ~ <br />Councilmember Zimmerman' stated that at a provious meeting~i~;~oun~; had authorized some <br />money for a turnaround andinquired'if the'devet°ber wout~!~i~'~funding that money to the City <br />since the street is now going through. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied that she did not believe that the funds were <br />paid because the plat was approved. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler noted that he would verify that information. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if a trail fee was collected for the Apple Ridge subdivision <br />to cover the costs of the trail along T.H. #47. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied that she was not sure if trail fees were collected <br />when Apple Ridge was platted. She explained that the trail would be constructed from River <br /> <br />City Council/January 22, 2002 <br /> Page 11 of 27 <br /> <br />-37- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.