Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />:1 <br /> <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />the garages. The roof will have asphalt shingles and all structures comply with the 35' height <br />limit. Each unit will have an attached double car garage. The landscaping plan is generally <br />acceptable subject to the revisions requested in the staff review letter. City Staff recommends <br />site plan approval contingent upon compliance with the city staff review letter dated December <br />28, 2001, final plat approval, and the property being rezoned to R3-U. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br />Craig from Shade Tree Construction presented the renderings of the <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner <br />for the townhomes proposed as part of The Ponds subdivision c~ <br />the City Staff review letter dated December 28, 2001, final <br />rezoned to R3-U. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chair Kociscak, <br />Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairpers0nNixt <br /> <br />upon <br />and the <br /> <br />approval <br /> with <br /> <br />on, Sweet, Reeve, and <br />Brauer. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING/COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #5: Request for Comt <br /> Inc. <br /> <br />C~'..~£. Edina Development, <br /> <br />Vice Chair Kociscak closed <br />in order to call the public <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />Vice Chair Kociscak <br /> <br />g Commission meeting at 8:39 p.m. <br /> <br />at 8:39 p.m. <br /> <br />PresentatiOn~:-: ; :: <br /> <br />PrinCiPal Pla~er Tmdg~n in September the Pla~ng Co~ission reviewed ~d' <br />g~mended <br /> approvaF~?~e request by Edina Development bc. for a comprehensive pl~ <br />a~ndment to change th~d use of prope~ located no~ of Alpine Drive ~d west of State <br />High:~';~7 ~om co~al and single family residemial to Ugh densi, residential. ~e <br />Ci~ C&h~fl:.reviewe&::~?request on December 11, 2001 ~d de~ed ~e comprehensive plan <br />amendment':'¢~{~Uest~u~:ng the meeting, some of the council members indicated a willin~ess <br />to review a ~e~;nsive pl~ amendment request for medium densi, residential uses. <br />Subsequently, Edlh~ Development, Inc. has submi~ed ~ applicmion for a comprehensive pl~ <br />amendment to ch~ge the land use desi~ation on the subject prope~ ~om co~ercial and <br />single hmily residential to medium densi~ residential. ~e comprehensive plan mendment, <br />coupled with their rezoning request, would allow the applicant to construct a tow~ouse <br />development. Phncipal Plier Tmdgeon stated ~e Ci~ Council Mopted the March 2001 <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 3, 2002 <br /> Page 13 of 18 <br /> <br />-35- <br /> <br /> <br />