My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/08/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 01/08/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:02:20 AM
Creation date
9/4/2003 9:12:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/08/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
250
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Assistant Wald replied that the City .Engineer has reviewed the plan <br />and has not made any negative comments, but she could discuss the issue further with him. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen questioned the proposed density. <br /> <br />Community Development Assistant Wald replied that there would be 84 units, which would <br />calculate at six units per acre net. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if all streets will be private. <br /> <br />Community Development Assistant Wald replied that the main street through the development <br />would be a City street, and then the connector streets to the units will be private. <br /> <br /> if the City has received negative comments about that <br /> <br />Councilmember <br />type of set up in the <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replie discussed the issues of private streets, but has not <br />come to a firm <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen the current ordinance states. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that t~i~City accept ~s,~rivate streets or public streets. <br /> <br />Pnnmpal Pla~er Tmdgeon explamed~ ~that3:~the~:~amng Co~ss~on and Pubhc Works <br />Committee discussed guidelines for private s nd o~9f those items discussed would be <br />that the main thoroughhre would be a CiW ~3~et a he driveways would be <br /> private <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that they did say that the~¥~mted'~..::~Public s~eet t~ough the <br />development for public safety reasons and then the private s~eets~,~,~~-~-~:~:~:,e called private' drives' <br />not private streets. ~¢~ <br /> <br />Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler stated that sta~as under ~e ~pression that there <br />was a consensus that the main ~efial streets be public sweet ~d ~en the other co~ectors acting <br />as a driveways. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen questioned the lengths of the private roads. <br /> <br />Corey Leper, Orfin Thompson, replied approximately 210 feet to 220 feet. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that he felt that the Public Works Committee should come up <br />with some criteria to help the Council out when deciding what the private drives should look like <br />for public safety purposes. <br /> <br />City Council/December 11, 2001 <br /> Page 21 of 25 <br /> <br />-65- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.