Agenda - Council - 01/23/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I ! I I I '1 I I i I I I i I haul route would be through the golf course to 153rd and out to Hwy. #10. If the mat~hi;Tis hauled to 1534 and Armstrong, the City will determine the route. There should be ':i:0 ,, use St. Andrews Lane or other local streets. Brad Lano - 15717 St. Andrews Lane - Stated his home is at the very edge and traffic flow is an issue. There have been 3 modifications to the Nor wondered if there would be more modifications because some of these only 1 size, Will these 40+ lots be phased in? ' .:?¢~ Mr. Peck replied that Northfork has Class A and Class B lots. ~ A~is~-~-!require' ~'" '"" larger homes than Class B lots. Every lot in St. Andrews Addition will be?g(~i'~ss A lotJ:':~:No standards will be reduced. The plan is final plat the northerly lots this S :¢:~:::~::~ the oth~halfof the lots in 2002. ~?~i" Adjournment Motion by Commission Kociscak and seconded by hearing. to adjourn the public Motion Carded. Voting Yes: Chai~3~;Nixt, Commissioners Watson, and andWivoda. Voting No: None. ATb~t? Q~issioners Johnson and The public hearing adjourned a~ '~:40 Chai~erson Nixt 'noted: .that the deviation:;~0m the street ~d paaem will require Council approval. He 3';'6 stated t~t~he is in hvor o~?~kre~i~g the s~cmre setback on Lots 11 and 12 of Block 2'{~77k point wher;[;~he width of the ~f~{~(~' 160 feet wide, because ~e alternative of combin~g *~ ~o lots wou~~reate one incre~:;~arge lot. Steve Ja~ow~:aat~[tha~ the¥~51dfi3:h(:(~6 Lots 11 ~d 12 sounds workable, but he Would have to review the dimenSiofis before m~ng an ~alysis. Motion. by.Chmcerson' Nt~ ~a: seconded by Co~lssmner Watson to reco~end that CiW Councd approve the prehmma~ plat for St. ~drews Addition contingent upon compliance wi~ the City Staff Review Le~er; and the configuration of Lots 11 ~d 12 will be conditioned upon the Developer:'S~bmittin~:'~evised prelimina~ plat that addresses smcmre setback issues to ~e satisfaction of the"city En~neer. Motion Ca, ed:~: Voting Yes: Chaicerson Nixt, Co~issioners Kociscak, Reeve, Watson, and '"'~.. ~d Wivod~' Voting No: None. Absent: Co~issioners Jonson ~d Gfiffiths. Case ~: Request For A Grading Petit To Grade And Export Soils; Case Of North Inc. ,,:: ~. ~orK, Planning Commission/January 2, 2001 Page 5 of 15 -21 -