Agenda - Council - 07/10/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

would stick out if the rest of the homes are larger. He recommended splitting the lot and adding a portion to each of the neighboring lots. Mike Engels, 145th Court, Ramsey, stated that there will be lot of issues that people are going to talk about regarding the development, but his main concerns have to do with the drainage ponds, and tree preservation, and traffic. He inquired as to how the traffic study was completed because he did not think that the number presented were reasonable with the size of proposed. He also stated that CSAH. #5 is a major corridor to Ramsey be the first thing that people see. He suggested that some type of buffer #5. In regards to 145th Court he would expect them to extend the road all of the trees until the property is ready to built on and then builder. The other things he did not understand is why some some would be dry. He stated that this will be very a big felt that the City needed to proceed carefully with it. being will ed along CSAH but leave up to the wet and and Joe Field, 5931 1452' Lane, Ramsey, stated that he the development of the peninsula, but he does ob peninsula. He explained that he has seen a number of' numerous wildlife in the area. The peninsula is a beautiful would enjoy the beauty of the peninsula of photographs of the peninsula. He affect everyone that lives across the pons. made that some type of standard be included Denise Albrecht, 143rd traffic. Speeding along~D~rosiu~:::~S~: very development. a legal objection to of the trees along the pond area, and there is even the new development :he Commission the peninsula would see some assurances that her main concern has to do with it will only get worse with the proposed Ron Sorenski?, 14J]:~'!.'J~nket of the holding ponds are proposed to be behind his house and ~ of his property is low land. He did not understand why the pond:~.6~i~Yhot~be i~ated., in that location. Mr. Sorenski. reviewed the area for the $~i~'.9,14545 ~pton'5~eet, Ri~sey, stated that there =e vew uNque assets N these ner~p0oo s. ~t was ~eii=e of the =ees =d ponds that they chose to move Nto Rmsey. She stated~,~at Jt was her und~anding that the Park Co~ssion w~ considering cash in lieu of g~een sp~e;~whch she:dl~:~ot~..: . th~ was a good decision. H= omer concern had to do wire the health of the~e~andg:Sfide the development occurs. She explained that ~e development is just under me mregh ia' ' eeding an enviromental assessment, which she s=ongly urged me CiW to complete bef0~)~proving the development. Stacy Dresel, Iodine Street, Ramsey, stated that three are several children that live along Iodine Street and she has a problem with the statement that was made regarding the additional five to Planning Commission/June 5, 2001 Page 11 of 30 -33-