Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />CASE <br /> <br />INTRODUCE PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO AMEND REGULATIONS <br />RELATING TO THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS: <br /> By: Community Development Director Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />City Staff has been working with the Horse Care Board for several months to review and update <br />the City's regulations for keeping farm animals and horses. The current farm animal ordinance <br />states that a property owner may have two goats, pigs or cows in any combination, as long as <br />they have 3-20 acres of land and a conditional use permit from the City. Beyond 20 acres, there <br />are no limits on the kinds and numbers of animals they may have (as long as it doesn't become a <br />nuisance). Currently, there are no regulations regarding the keeping of exotic animals such as <br />ostriches. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The result of this effort is threefold and the proposed ordinances were presented to City Council <br />on June 12. First of all, it was recommended that the farm animal ordinance redefine the list of <br />farm animals to include cows, mules, donkeys, burros, ponies, goats, pigs, sheep, lamb, turkey, <br />geese, chickens and ducks. Each type of animal was assigned a number of animal units based on <br />production of waste. Then an appropriate number of animal units was prescribed for various size <br />parcels ranging fi'om 3 to 20+ acres. The number of animal units allowed on a parcel would be <br />decreased by 1 unit for each horse being maintained on the subject property when there is a mix <br />of farm animals and equines. Language was also added to require a conditional use permit for <br />the maintenance of exotic animals on a parcel. <br /> <br />Secondly, it was recommended that the horse ordinance be clarified to reflect that when only <br />· equines are being maintained on a property, the number of animals allowed is based on parcel <br />size only and not based on units of waste production as in the farm animal ordinance. The <br />proposed ordinance amends the parcel size requirements for maintaining horses. Currently the <br />horse ordinance states that a property owner may have 2 horses on 3 acres, and one additional <br />horse fbr each 1/2 acre over 3. The ordinance amendment would require one .full .acre over 3 for <br />each additional horse. Language was also added to allow for the lease of contiguous property for <br />increasing the number of permitted horses on a parcel when the horse owner has title to at least 3 <br />acres. <br /> <br />Thirdly, Chapter 5 has a Barns and Stables section that requires barns to be at least 50 feet from <br />any place of human habitation. The R-1 Rural Residential Section in Chapter 9 requires barns to <br />be at least 75 feet from any property line. The ordinance amendments would transfer the 75 foot <br />barn setback requirement from Chapter 9 to Chapter 5, .in the same section as the 50 foot setback <br />requirement. <br /> <br />-173- <br /> <br /> <br />