Agenda - Council - 08/14/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Community Development Director Frolik replied that both streets were platted to eventually be through streets. Mark Barrett, 5221 155th Lane NW, Ramsey, stated that he represented a large number of residents along 155th Avenue who are concerned with the outlet that runs along Woodland Green Park. One of the homeowners on the southeast lot circulated a petition requesting the outlet at 155th Lane be eliminated. According to the traffic patterns it will be the point to the development with 410 trips per day. There is an existing park proposed improvements to the park occurring as part of the develo populated with very young children and the road does not exit to period would be during the morning and afternoon hours when off the school bus and going to the playground. Also have the development will occur over a three to five year children in the area. The one issue that has not been At 155"' Lane, it is the low point of the entire area. feels that the straight stretch of roadway will be a elevate that, but everyone knows how well children the north side of the road. He proposed that the that the three cul-de-sacs at the southern of the devek the dl the risk it is the topOgraphy has a topograph3 aCCeSS with area is highly highest travel on and saying The sidewalks will sidewalk is only on not be permitted and combined. Dan Nelson, 15420 Ute Street, Ramsey, will have the most impact because he will lives on a cul-de-sac and now it is being dramatically. He has small children~ ~and on the north side of the dev. el:6¢m~n~;~have nobody has made that off~ ~him.'~;~ also-~ - "~':~- su and behind his pro. pb~}?to_.~': "~ of a transition from a cUlcdeLsac to a the area. His property ~erty. He currently traffic levels will increase on a mil-de-sac for a reason. People the opportunity to purchase outlots, but :1 continuing the bike path from Ute Street Mr. Nelson also expressed how the City Engineer Olson property would be restored back to its current condition. He noted that'th~::~ii~a was l~i'~t{4d as a through street, but was constructed as a temporary cul-de- sa . ,';' .,. ~ '~'!~";i ~- ':i:;;:,, ~¢:. ~2. Iqelson noted that af(: the oth~:'~treets that were pla~ed as ~ough s~eets were posted with bamcades. He had no idea~:that his cul-de-sac was a proposed ~ough s~eet. In April when he was ' ahasing the hom ;"(he inquired at Ci~ Hall if there was development pl~ Zr the property and:he was told'[h°['' Co~uniW D'~9;i~4~;;nt Director Frolik noted ~at notices were mailed to all prope~ owners, but in his case th'~:b°st office may have fo~arded the notice to ~e previous owner. I I I Eric Ness, 15390 Ute Street, Ramsey, stated that he moved into his home last week. He questioned if there was a way that Ute Street could stay a cul-de-sac so their neighborhood would remain the same. He explained the he will have five or six lots in the back of his property and Planning Commission/July 12, 2001 Page 13 of 23 -37-