Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Kociscak, Reeve, and Watson. <br />Voting No' None. Absent: Commissioners Johnson and Sweet. <br /> <br />Note: This item was subsequently tabled with Items 6 and 7. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment; Case of Jacob Barthold and <br />Oakwood Land Development, Inc. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik summarized the Staff <br />recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />~e public hearing closed at 8:35 p.m. with the heahng.~6~he previoa~{~ng agenda item. <br />Commission Bus~ness <br /> <br />Motion by Chaicerson Nixt, seconded by:~issjgner Kocis~}~O~.reco~end that the <br />Council adopt the resolution authorizing sikff:t6~'m~;~e:;:~:~ .,~ .~ .%~C°mpr.~:~Ye Plan ~endment to <br /> <br />Motion Ca, ed. Voting Yes:,_.Chai~erson Si~:Co~issioners Kociscak, Reeve, and Watson. <br />Voting No: None. Absent:' C6~i'~ioners Jo~dhXknd Sweet. <br /> <br />xot~: Thi~ item w~-~ub~equent~y ta~ea with Item;~:~;S~:~nd 7. <br />PLANNING COMMISsIoN B~'~ <br />Case ~;.," ;:':R~quest for'Sketch Plan Review of ~ver P~es 5t~ Addition; Case of <br /> ..... :~" ~ ....... Oakwood Land D~velopmen~ Inc. <br /> <br />Presdntation ', <br /> <br />Co~ity. Development. Director Frolik stated there are 13 urban lots rather than 12 as <br />mentioned in.~e Staff Repon, <br /> <br />Community BBvel0pment Director Frolik stated that ~e City received an application 5om <br />Oakwood Land Development for a subdivision to be named ~ver Pines 5~ Addition. The <br />prope~y is located on the west side of T.H. ~47, i~ediately no~h of the existing Apple <br />Ridge/River Pines neighborhood. The application proposes to subdivide and plat the prope~ <br />into 13 single hmily residential lots with urban sPlices ~d an existing homestead that will <br />continue to utilize an on-site septic system ~d well. Public hea~gs are not required at the <br /> <br />Planning Commission/September 10, 2001 <br /> Page 13 of 24 <br /> <br /> <br />