My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/25/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 09/25/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:27:51 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 2:57:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/25/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
369
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
referenced as options 1, 2 and 3 in the enclosures. The City Staff review letter <br />comments on these alternatives. The Planning Commission recommended <br />approval of Option B. <br /> <br />Dan Blake, Centex Homes, thanked the Council for the opportunity to review <br />that he had worked long and hard with the neighbors and that each <br />Centex has tried to work those issues out for each area. He stated <br />comments from residents regarding road connections to the north from the addition <br />wanted to note that there is not a big impact on the developmeng..Ti.f:-~se co~ectlons are not <br />made so the decision will have to be made by the Council <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that the Council is obligate&f6;i:espond District Court ruling <br />regarding the property and reviewed what was include( ruling. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that the ruling did not <br />work with the developer on the layout of streets, trails etc. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that that was true. <br /> <br />the City can not <br /> <br />Cary Manuel, 15668 Juniper Rk <br />most of residents were told, <br />into one acre lots. He explained' that the;?~sidents to <br />developer and have chosen to purchase ~::i~kffer <br />can live with. Mr. Manuel felt that the <br />that the Council cul-de-sac the two pro <br /> <br /> the property h~ long history and <br /> the pro would be developed <br /> met with the <br /> and is now a plan they <br /> )art and know they requested <br />streets fo the north so that traffic in their <br /> <br />neighborhood can;contimi~ kith their existingpattern~. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak questioned the safety concerns if the streets to the north were cul-de-sacs <br />leaving no, through streets t6 tfi~e north. <br /> <br />Director of-- - ~' "' "~-~'~" --" Publie~;Wofks/Fi~e Chik£':~i~i~'~eplied that from a safety standpoint more access is <br />always better. ' <br /> <br />~d~/ncil~ember Kural~ ~nquired' i~,it would pose an increase in danger for emergency vehicles if <br />the roads wer~e cul-de-sacs.":: <br /> <br />Director of Public Works/Fire Chi ef Kapler replied that the Waco Street cul-de-sac would exceed <br />the cul-de-sac ordinance length requirement. <br /> <br />Gary Martz,,5220 15 5th Lane, Ramsey, stated that his home is located to the west of the proposed <br />development and would like to see no increase in traffic along their street as well. He stated that <br />if the Council is going to allow for one cul-de-sac then all through streets, except in the southern <br />portion of the property, should be cul-de-sacs. <br /> <br />City Council/August 28, 2001 <br /> Page 11 of 35 <br /> <br />-61- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.