Laserfiche WebLink
Case #8: <br /> <br />Request Site Plan approval; Case of Star Exhibits <br /> <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Community Development Assistant Wald explained that Star Exhibits <br />currently operates in Brooklyn Park. They have outgrown their current <br />relocate their business to the City of Ramsey. The City has <br />Exhibits contractor, Amcon, for the development of an of-rice/warehouse <br />property is generally located to the east of County Road #116 <br />conjunction with the proposed site plan, the City of Ramsey is <br />to subdivide approximately 4l acres into four parcels to <br />Exhibits and future commercial/industrial <br />and warehouses exhibits for companies that <br />proposing to locate on a parcel that is zOned <br />warehousing activities are permitted uses. The site plan <br />square foot office/warehouse facility with a possible 28 <br />revised site plan has been received and does comply with the <br />recommends approval. <br /> <br /> that <br /> to <br /> plan <br /> ~. The <br /> <br /> pia~lng process <br /> evelopment of Star <br /> m~ufacmres, "~z~ <br /> shows. ~ey are <br /> and <br />~ 185,000 <br />foot ~mre Mdifion. A <br />~e Ci~ Staff <br /> <br /> I <br /> ! <br />'1 <br />I <br /> I <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt questioned <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski dir%~d att&~on <br />registered wetlands. ::5~< <br /> <br />to a <br /> <br />the wetlands. They are <br /> <br />Commission Business: · <br /> <br /> ',.7; ~: .4 ," '"5 i~. <br />Motion by Jo~:&, second:~dby Chairperson that the City Council approve <br />the propose&site plan for Am,~ cpn contingent )liance with City Staff review letter dated <br />September'28,,2001 and co~gent upon road intersection wi~ the County. <br /> <br />Further discu~:S~a:, DezmN~cOme~:Of~com stated the access off 143~ Avenue for Star <br />Exhibits to proceed re;critical. If this access is not approved, it will make a major impact on how <br /> <br />Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Kociscak, Reeve, <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Sweet, and Watson. Votm~iN6: None. <br /> <br />Case #9: D'i~cussion Regarding Public Versus Private Streets <br /> <br />.Pres entation. <br />i !5 : .,. <br />City. Ert'~'~$r Jankowski stated there has been a lot of discussion over the past few <br /> months <br />regarding the use of private streets and whether or not we should allow them. A list of <br />a&v,.antages and disadvantages along with a h/story of the use of private streets were discussed at <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 4, 2001 <br /> Page 16 of 18 <br /> <br />-207- <br /> <br /> <br />