My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 07/12/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2001
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 07/12/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:57:47 AM
Creation date
9/5/2003 10:05:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
07/12/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Preliminary Plat Review: Centex Addition <br />July 5, 2001 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />ll. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />All ponding areas must be dedicated as drainage and utility easements as well as have a <br />minimum of twenty (20) foot wide easement for access. All areas where there are storm <br />sewers must have at least a 20 foot wide drainage and utility easement. <br /> <br />The standard 10 foot (5 foot on common property lines) drainage and utility easements <br />around the perimeter of each lot should be shown on the final plat. <br /> <br />Stormwater Manaaement Fee: The City has established a storm water management fee of <br />$375 per unit that must be paid prior to release of the final plat for recording. <br /> <br />REU Number: The City has enacted a quarterly drainage utility charge that is applicable to <br />each unit in the proposed development. <br /> <br />Traffic Generation Analysis: During sketch plan review, a traffic generation analysis was <br />prepared based upon the submission ar the time. The preliminary, plat has reduced the overall <br />number of lots from 157 to 155 units, which w/Il proportionately reduce the overall traffic <br />generated from the development. However, the internal street changes within the <br />development are significant, and the traffic subdistricts are being reviewed. A revised <br />analysis w/ll be prepared and presented at the Planning Commission meeting on July 12. The <br />revised report will describe the traffic impact, s to the areas adjacent to the development. <br /> <br />Staff has concerns over the revised street system. The straight ali~,mm-nents of 155th Lane and <br />of Waco Street make these two streets particularly strong candidates for future traffic <br />calming requests. In addition, the revised plan creates three more cul-de-sacs than the <br />original plan. The lack ofthrough streets increases traffic on the remaining through street <br />which in mm exasperates the traffic calming issues, <br /> <br />Tree Preservation Plan: As stated at the time of Sketch Plan Review, the Preliminary <br />Grading and Erosion Control Plan does identify existing tree growth and removal limits. The <br />addition of one 2.5 inch dbh tree to each lot needs to be stared on the Plan. <br /> <br />Sidewalks. In accordance with City Code, sidewalks are proposed on,one side of all non cul- <br />de-sac streets. TSze Park Commission recommended that the sidewalk on X!dmo Street be <br />located on the west versus the east side of the road; a modifmation to the preliminary plat is <br />required. Sidewalks are not park dedication credit eligible. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.