My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/10/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2000
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/10/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:59:13 AM
Creation date
9/8/2003 3:12:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
02/10/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Zimmerman, Connolly, <br /> Anderson, and Hendriksen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />5. Mr. Johnson stated that ACCAP is requesting a recommendation from Council to proceed <br /> with the development agreement and formation of a Qualified Housing District for tax <br /> increment financing. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen stated that he thinks what Mr. Johnson is requesting is included in <br /> Case #4 and #5 of the consent agenda. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Hendriksen, seconded by Councilmember Connolly, to approve <br />items #4 and #5 of the consent agenda. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Hendriksen, Connolly, Anderson, <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />6. Mr. Johnson stated that an optional source of financing for the townhomes has been made <br /> available from MHOP that would require the money to be distributed to the City and then the <br /> City would have to allocate to the project. It would require that four of the housing units be <br /> charged 30 percent of their annual salary for rent and three of the four units must be given <br /> priority to Minneapolis residents, but ali of the same regulations apply. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly suggesting including the issue in neighborhood meetings. <br />Councilmember Anderson inquired if these units would be in addition to section eight vouchers. <br />Mr. Johnson replied yes that it would be separate from any other financing program. <br />Councilmember Anderson questioned how many units can use a section eight vouchers. <br /> <br />Ms. Wright replied 25 percent or less. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that ACCAP needs to be up front with the residents. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired how many dollars would be involved with the additional funding. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson replied $120,000 per unit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that he is not the biggest fan of the project, but he has agreed <br />reluctantly to continue with the project, but going in the direction of making the development <br />less appealing to the neighborhood would be leaning towards losing his support. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson stated that they are only making the request, but it will not impact whether or not <br />the development is done. <br /> <br /> City Council/November 23, 1999 <br /> Page 24 of 25 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.