Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> 5 <br /> <br /> 6 <br /> <br /> 7 <br /> <br /> 8 <br /> <br /> 9 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />72 <br /> <br />have an answer now? <br /> <br />DENNIS EYLER: <br /> <br />answer that. <br /> <br />LARRY BAKKEN: <br /> <br />that? Okay. <br /> <br />We want an answer. <br /> <br /> I might be able to <br /> <br />You want to answer <br /> <br />DENNIS EYLER: The issue of better <br /> <br />entry, or neighborhood connectivity was really <br /> <br />not one of the justifications. I brought that <br /> <br />up because I feel concerned about who might <br /> <br />actually be added to the traffic. The primary <br />purpose is to provide another way out of that <br /> <br />area between 47 and 5. <br /> <br />RESIDENT: We don't need it. <br /> <br /> DENNIS EYLER: That's fine. You can <br />say that to the council. There's no other <br /> <br />issue. And the issue -- the issue is, you <br />know, when we were presented this, when we <br />were doing the -- back in '95 we were shown on <br />the maps, and he's got the history of the <br />maps, and there were no outways in there. <br />Then we started with the idea that the <br />connection was going to be a straight <br />connection with 147th. <br /> <br />We looked at the fact that MNDot <br />wanted to consolidated the accesses for the <br /> <br />ADAMS COURT REPORTING (612) 421-2486 <br /> <br /> <br />