My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/13/1999
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1999
>
Agenda - Council - 07/13/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 3:43:20 PM
Creation date
9/12/2003 9:27:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/13/1999
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
following issues for further review: 1) 39 wetlands would be crossed with 26.2 acres of <br />potential wetland impacts; 2) 70 residences in the project area would be within 50 feet <br />of the construction fight-of-way; 3) 112 drinking water supply wells would be within <br />150 feet of the construction right-of-way; 4) About 9.8 miles of prime farmland soil <br />would be crossed by the project route; and 5) Alternative routes may be available to <br />mitigate impact on sensitive areas. Ms. Sherman pointed out that FERC is asking for <br />comments that focus on the potential environmental effects of the proposal and <br />alternatives to the proposal that may lessen the environmental effects. She stated that in <br />addition to the issues already identified, staff suggests including the following issues for <br />further study: 1) A comparison of alternative routes, including number of residences <br />impacted; 2) Vegetation disruption and restoration including erosion control measures <br />proposed; 3) The ability to consolidate the existing pipeline and the proposed pipeline; <br />and 4) Impacts of two routes versus one route through the community if an alternative is <br />selected. <br /> <br />Winslow Holasek, an area resident, stated that one of the concerns Ramsey previously <br />mentioned was about the shut-off valves. Currently they are manual and someone has to <br />drive from North Branch to shut them off. <br /> <br />Ms. Sherman responded that staff did not view that as much an environmental issue as a <br />safety issue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen asked that staff add shut-off valve to the four items. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Hendriksen and seconded by Councilmember Anderson to <br />authorize staff to prepare a letter for signature by the Mayor to be submitted to FERC <br />requesting inclusion of the listed items, plus the item about the shut-off valve and any <br />other items identified in their environmental review. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Hendfiksen, Anderson <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #11: Consultant Selection for Redevelopment Study <br /> <br />Community Development Director Sherman stated that in the 1999 adopted budget, the <br />City Council authorized $25,000 for studies to further refine the comprehensive planning <br />process. One area of study that the City has identified is a study regarding the <br />redevelopment potential of underutilized industrial properties. Staff drafted a Request for <br />Proposal that the Council approved on March 23, and it was sent to 10 consulting firms. <br />The City received proposals from four of these firms. Based on interviews conducted by <br />the Zoning Administrator, the Community Development Assistant and Ms. Sherman, and <br />the proposal submitted, staff is recommending Hoisington, Koegler Group, Inc.. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Hendriksen and seconded by Mayor Gamec to hire <br />Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. to complete the study of redevelopment sites as outlined <br /> <br />City Council/May 11, 1999 <br />Page 14 of 19 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.