My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 04/13/1999
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
1999
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 04/13/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2025 2:00:20 PM
Creation date
9/12/2003 11:58:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
04/13/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Kent, Members Hardin, Haas Steffen, Scheiber, and <br />Wagner. Voting No: None. Absent: Members Riley and Zimmerman. <br /> <br />Member Haas Steffen stated that City staff needs to outline what they want out of this EDA and <br />if the budget meets that---what are the responsibilities in terms of budget dollars. She questioned <br />whether the EDA was expected to make recommendations in terms of TIF, and Mr. Norman <br />replied yes. Ms. Haas Steffen directed staff to brh, g the policies to Council before the EDA. <br />She said it was her understanding that staff intends to use the EDA in the broadest way possible, <br />and she doesn't want Council wondering why the EDA is doing what they do. Ms. Sherman <br />noted them is an enabling resolution that is very general. Chairperson Kent noted they made <br />sure the EDA didn't have final authority, only advisory capacity. Ms. Haas Steffen stated a <br />budget is unnecessary if the EDA is only advisory, but if it is going to investigate or sit at the <br />negotiating table, it needs the power to direct staff. <br /> <br />Case #3: Ramsey City Staff Updates Memorandum <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman explained the memorandum regarding the current status of the <br />contract for economic development consultant services is for informational purposes since all <br />parties have not been contacted yet. He outlined the City's past economic development with Jim <br />Gromberg and then Connexus, stating that the City is currently reviewing its staffing and hasn't <br />determined whether to use in-house staffing or contract outside. The current contract was <br />discussed. <br /> <br />Member Hardin stated the City needs to determine what kind of services are needed and whether <br />in-house staff is able to provide that. Member Haas Steffen agreed that we need to determine <br />what we have, what we need, what we can afford, and what we need to contract for. <br /> <br />Chairperson Kent inquired what the 1998 contract expenses were, and Mr. Norman stated he <br />hasn't seen any pay-out for the 1% commission. <br /> <br />Member Wagner stated the City certainly could afford in-house staff if they spent $80,000. <br /> <br />Member Haas Steffen declared "There is no way the EDA should have four staff members <br />meeting at 7:00 a.m. unless they are working on the hottest program; it's poor use of money and <br />time." <br /> <br />Member Hardin stated "That's part of what's been lost; someone that's able to take the ball and <br />be lead of economic development. It would be nice to get back to someone designated as lead." <br /> <br />Mr. Norman stated the RFP was just completed, and if Council appoints a new Administrative <br />Services Director, staff wants that person to work with it also. <br /> <br />Member Haas Steffen suggested getting information on what other cities contract for, including <br />job descriptions, and find out if it's common to do what Ramsey did with Connexus. <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority/February 23, 1999 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.