Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Deemer stated he did not understand the rus/~ as this was approved five months ago and <br />has seen no act~. Chakpe~aBawden explained the length of the interr~ approval process for banks. <br /> <br />Ma. Johnson s-'tated this would be a drive-up and walk-in facility, wkh adequate parking. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer stated that a paved parking lot would be a better option. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner LalX~ and seconded by Commissioner Thomd to recommend CoundJ <br />approval of the Interim Use Permit as submitted. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Cha/rperson Bawden, Commissioners LaDue, Thomd, Deemer, Jensen, <br />and Terry. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Holland. <br /> <br />Case ~5: <br /> <br />Request for Sketch Plan Review of I{unt Addition; Case of Floremce and t(arold <br />~tmt <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Sylv/a Frolik explained that the property was located at the southeast Lntersec~cm <br />of County Road ~-63 and County Road #5. She explained ~hstt the property is a farmly estate, <br />appmxJrrmely 40 acres in size} proposed to be split into three lot~ Ms. l~rolik explained that Lots 2 and <br />3 w/il accommodate ex/sling homesteads for Florence Hunt and her san, tlarold; and Lot 1 w~ be <br />conveyed co another scum <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik explained that the three lot minor subdivision is in conformance with the 4 in 40 dens/ty <br />zoning. However, the rain/mum lot size in the Rural Service Area'is 1eh acres and Lots 2 and 3 are eight <br />and three acres respectively. Ms. Frolik explained that the proposed Iot sizes are in accordance with a <br />family agreern~t as to the division o£the es~e. City Staffls recommending approval ora variance of the <br />minimmn tot size as it does not violate the 4 in 40 density zoning res~crictiom <br /> <br />Mm Frolik explained that the% have received informm/o.n from Anoka County and they are reques~g an <br />exlra27 feet of fight-of-way south of the center line ofCountyRoad ~g63. The County is also requesting <br />that all trees in the County fight-of-way a~ access points be removed to azcomm~>date sight ~stance <br />requirernen~ Ni~ Frolik expt~i_n~d that the City v~l waive the rransportalSon impact fee in exchange for <br />the extra 27 feet ofr/ght-of-way. <br /> <br />I-Iarold Hunt, 17555 Nowthen Boulevard N.W., stated that he had ho.problem removing the treer~ but <br />was not sure of the location of the 27 £e~t. Mr. J~ankowski expiated thxt there is cmrently 33 feet of <br />right-oLway, and now Anoka County wants 60 feet south oft_he center line ofTJ-I ~-63. Mr. Ffunt stated <br />he had no problem with that proposal. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/August 6, 15}96 <br /> Page 18 of 20 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br /> <br /> <br />