Agenda - Council - 10/08/1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ,! ! ! ! ! ! ! I Commissioner D .~eemer advised he has a "hand shake" purchase agreement on the property across fi.om this entranc~ and just to the norfl% Because offs, he desires a strai~t alignment with the proposed access. ! .rrm lohnson, engineering flora Bolton & Menk representing the petitioner, advised that the revised egress driveway ~ directly across fi.om the location mentioned by Commissioner Deemer. Mr. 3ohnsan chilled that they are not proposing curb and gutter along the entire south edge of the parking lot because within the next year they expect the house to be removed and will then extend the driveway. He/exphined the drainage goes to the northwest so there should be no mnoffgoing into the turf area.;' Along the north edge, the site will have concrete curb and gutter except for the locations of futur~ drive aisle openings which will have bit, ruinous curb. Commissioner D~rner asked if he should abstain from action on thi~ item. Chairperson Bawden ~ated k is his opiiaion there is no need for Comrn~.~sioner Deemer to abstain fi.om the vote. Motion by Com~ sioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Holland to recommend that City Council grant sit~ plan approval to the access and off-meet parking improvements at Lord of Life Church contingen[t upon Anoka County approva/of same. Motion carrlexL Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Holland,' lensen, LaDue, and Thomd. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Terry. Case ia: Request for Site Plan Review; Case ofShorewood R.V. Zoning Adrainlst~or Sylvia Frolik expl~,Sned that John Menke of Shorewood tLV. h~ applied for site plan review t~, construct and operate a full-service recreational vehicle center on the south side ofI~ghway 10 at ~ intron with Llama Street. It was not ed the development includes a 27,115 square foot budding far indoor display, sales or, ce, and maintenance shop areas, served by an on-site septic and well, ~knd proposes access from three locations on Pdverdale Drive NW and one egress onto Llama Str6et. The proposed development is in compliance with City Code regarding lot coverage, setba~.s, architectural standards, landscaping, and .waste storage. However, the future bu~dlng expanfio~ proposed on the south side of the Structure will encroach by five feet into the 35 foot setback train'-the south property line. Therefore, ~_~ffrecommends relocating the building five feet north. Ms. Frolik adviaed the see plan does not' dearly reflect that all display and parking areas will be surfaced with b' ~r~minous or that the entire perimeter will be finished with concrete curbing. She reviewed the nun~ of parldng spaces required, number provided, and noted tha'~ the s~te plan does not indicate the mumber of employees on the site so sba'is unsure if the four paring spaces will be su/~cient. Peter Iv_tiger, Portfolio Design .qen6.ces representing Shorewood R_V., stated their agreement with staffsuggestion t.o shLft the buiMi,g ~o the north to accommodate future building expansion. With respect to area~ to be surfaced in asphak versus Class V, he pointed out the area they intend to Planning Commission/October 1, 1996 Page 5 of 9