Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Case #2: Co~nsider Increase in Rates for Volunteer Fire Fighters <br /> <br />Administrative services Manager Waite Smith stated that the Fire Department came with a proposal <br />to increase the r~tes for fire calls and drills in the coming two years. She included some <br />information for comparing wages of other volunteer fire fighters. She added that the Fire Chief <br />was very diligent ~bout calculating out the rates requested and shows what the additional cost to the <br />budget will be. Tti. e 40% increase they are requesting for 1997 amounts to 60¢ per increment and <br />they are requesting that the door be "left open" for the 1998 increases. She added that they are not <br />out of line with other cities. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Beahen and seconded by Mayor Hardin to recommend City Council <br />approve increases :in compensation for Fire Department personnel as presented, effective January <br />1, 1997. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin and Councilmember Beahen. Voting No: None. <br />Absent: Councilrriember Beyer. <br /> <br /> Ms. Waite Smith added that the Fire Fighters are paid $5 per event when they are still in training, <br /> plus the Fire Chief~ does do an appraisal on all the Fire Fighters, which is not required. <br /> <br /> Case #3: City Administrator's Performance Appraisal <br /> <br />Administrative Seryices Manager Waite Smith stated that the performance appraisal forms had been <br />distributed to the Mayor and Councilmembers and to the Department Heads. She transferred the <br />information from~ the completed forms onto one form and sent that to the Mayor and <br />Councilmembers. She converted letter scores to numbers to compare the elected officials' <br />evaluations with the Department Heads' evaluations. She noted there was not a lot of difference in <br />the appraisals. Th'.e Department Heads were pretty much in agreement. There were lots of "meets <br />standards" on botli sides. One place in the Department Head score that was "below standard" was <br />in evaluating employees. They wished they would get more feed back. She reported a wide <br />difference in respf~nses from elected officials in the area of communication, decision making, <br />dependability and .~ommitment. She suggested that the Committee consider concentrating on the <br />areas where the rang was uneven. The different ratings are due to different perceptions. She <br />thought there are Pr°bably different expectations. The last item to consider is the Administrator's <br />contract. Given il~e fact that the ratings are in agreement and are by no means unacceptable, it's <br />time to do a new Contract. She handed out the proposed contract. She continued that Ryan has <br />had a contract hem before. She checked out the areas where this contract would differ from what <br />he's had before. We suggest the contract run for two years - to the end of 1998. She noted the <br />severance clause ~ad added that this is very typically in contracts for city managers and <br />administrators. It'~ pretty normal to have about a six-month severance clause but, due to the size <br />of the City, etc., ~we are recommending a four-month severance or until he would fred new <br />employment, whichever comes first. With regard to the car allowance, in 1996, all but two cities <br />were paying highar car allowances than Ramsey. She requested the car allowance be increased <br />another $50 to bririg it to $300. The average in other cities is $320 per month. The average salary <br />for Administrators!in Stanton Class IV cities was $69,500 last year and up to $70,300 this year. <br />Ryan is getting 82i5% of that average. Last year he ranked third from the bottom with regard to <br />pay and this year t~e will probably be at the bottom. She suggested looking at similar increases to <br />that of the bargain'.rog units - AFSCME received 5%, Exempt received 5% and LELS received a 3% <br />increase, but with ~tep increases which are more than 5% over ail. Our goal is to try to get salaries <br />up there closer to the average. Ms. Waite Smith recommended increasing his salary to $63,000 in <br />1996, $66,000 in 1997, and to $69,000 for 1998. Even then, he would be paid less in 1998 than <br />the average administrator in a city with similar population was paid in 1995. She quoted the wage <br />policy which says~that by the time an employee has been here for seven years, they should be at <br /> <br />Personnel Committee/September 9, 1996 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />1/9 <br /> <br /> <br />