My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/12/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1995
>
Agenda - Council - 09/12/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 3:47:08 PM
Creation date
9/26/2003 1:48:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/12/1995
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
408
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br /> i <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />M. Johnson made the statement that he did not feel it was right to <br />increase what other employees were receiving strictly to cover a family <br />i policy. He also suggested checking out a pre-tax fund. This would give <br />~ Chaffee an added advantage. <br /> <br />~Motion was made by B. Johnson, seconded by Schroeder THAT $144.00 <br />i WOULD BE THE STANDARD RATE ACROSS THE BOARD. <br /> <br />17 ayes, 0 nay. <br /> <br />;It was pointed out whether they wanted $144.00 stated in the minutes. <br />iThe motion was amended. <br /> <br />'.Motion was made by B. Johnson, seconded by THAT WHAT EVER <br />~THE HIGHEST SINGLE COVERAGE IS SHOULD BE WHAT IS PAID <br />~ACROSS THE BOARD WITH THE REMAINDER GOING TO A <br />~DEFERRED COMP ACCOUNT. <br /> <br />..7 ayes - 0 nay. Motion carried. <br /> <br />.The second issue to be discussed was development of a policy regarding <br />icontrol of the government access channel. Recently questions have <br />ibeen raised by people in several cities as to who is in control, how it is <br />'run and what are the operating procedures. Champlin had drafted <br />:their own in February. The policy has been reworked by Creighton and <br />O'Connell. O'Connell suggested this become the resolution by the <br />~:ommission to be sent to the cities. Each city could then adopt, reject or <br />Change it. The Personnel Committee is recommending this go out as a <br />draft model. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued as to what should be allowed on the government <br />access channel as opposed to the public access channel. Creighton <br />stated that it shouldn't be a forum for political advertising, t-Ie also <br />stated part of this resolution is to get O'Cormell out of the loop and that <br />all cities treated fairly. It is the cities channel but there should be some <br />guidelines that all cities follow and, therefore, the resolution. <br /> <br />There was discussion as to whether the resolution should be passed on <br />to the cities at this time, due to the fact that not all the Commissioners <br />are in agreement with the wording of the resolution. <br /> <br />Motion was made by Peterson, seconded by Jacobson THAT CITY <br />COUNCILS MAKE ANY CHANGES TO THE DP, APT RESOLUTION <br />THEY DEEM NECESSARY AND RETURN THEM TO O'CONNELL IN <br />A TIMELY FASHION. <br /> <br />7 ayes - 0 nay. Motion carried. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.