Laserfiche WebLink
May 5, 1994 page 2 of 2 <br /> <br />Page 13 of summary states that all information and plans were reviewed. I see no <br />mention of review or study of the document Figure zl, so this in a inaccurate slotemenl. <br />Because staff and engineering mighl have mentioned allernatives to each other does <br />not make them reviewed. They hove been planning this road for 5 years, (summer), <br />page 2- para. -1) all the loose ends should have been fled down by now, <br /> <br />As o planning commissioner for some 15 years, and also an eflecled properly owner, <br />they managed to keep me in the dark until fha slakes appeared in the ground fha week <br />of MorT- 11. This deviofion is major from the indicoled transpodation plan which all of <br />my previous oclions ore based. <br /> <br />Fudher nolo. The tack of consistenl page numbering, and missing or omifled paragraph <br />numbers make it very difficult to make references in this document. <br /> <br />I would expect the R.G.U. lo respond to this letter, Thai'means the city Council on e <br />point by point in writing. I believe that any Jetter senl in response should be reviewed by <br />the council before mailing es Mr Schroeder has not been open and above board in <br />dealing with me. There is a stroh9 question aboul whether the studied (chosen by staff) <br />alignment is causing other changes, or staff has been planing in concefl with o <br />developer. Staff completely ignored the comments by the Planning Commission, or in <br />fha least did not relay them 1o Council. <br /> <br />I hove personally driven Mr. Schroeder to fha silo in 1993 and explained my concerns <br />while there. He has either forgotten all this or has chosen to ignore it because he does <br />not appear to be willir~g to 1aka me at my word. <br /> <br />ty <br /> <br /> 14501 Sunfish Lake Btvd <br /> Ramsay, MN. 55303-4578 <br /> <br /> <br />