06/06/94 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 10. That on ~ay 24, 1994, the Ramsey City Council advised the Applicant to approach the Planning ~2ommission for a variance to cut-de-sac length in accordance with Section 9.50.30 (Subdivision Design Standards), Subsection 9.50.08 (Variances). 11. That on JUne 6, 1994, the Planning Commission was advised that DNR had denied the permit request to fill a portion of Wetland/14/2-114P in order to construct Krypton Street N.W. as a!through street. 12. That on Ju, ne 6, t994, the Planning Commission was also informed that bridging Wetland #2-114P i}; a second alternative to constructing Krypton Street N.W. as a through street, but it could adversely impact the City's opportunity to obtain a permit to cross the wetlands in that same proximity in order to extend Sunwood Drive as planned. 13. That the ~pplicant has stated that bridging the wetland is cost prohibitive for the creation of 13 lots. 14. That the special condition causing the undue hardship is the fact that the Subject Property is surrounde0 on three sides by wetland and this condition does not result from the actions of the Appliclmt. 15. That by reltson of physical conditions, namely Wetland #2-114P and County Ditch No. 43, strict com~Iiance with the requirements of cul-de-sac lengths will/will not cause exceptional and undue Ihardship to the development of the Subject Property. 16. That if granted, the variance will/will not adversely affect the spirit and intent of the Ramsey Zoning Chapter and Subdivision Design Standards. 17. 18. The motion for th~: adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: and the following abstained: and the following were absent: whereupon said re~olurion was declared duly adopted by the Ramsey City Council this the __ of ,1994. , Chairman ATTEST: CiD' Administrator