03/17/94 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

10. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. That there are unique circumstances applying to the subject property that do not generally apply to other properties in the district; namely, that Anoka County constructed improvements to C.S.A.H. #56 that included acquisition of additional fight-of-way and realignment of the roadway which diminished the front yard of the subject property. That the special conditions causing the undue hardship do not result from the actions of the Applicant. That similar variances have been granted by the City in the Residential District. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. That such variance is/is not necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the R- 1 Rural Residential District. That if gra_nted, the variance will/will not grant the Applicant any special privilege that is denied to other owners of lands, su'ucmres or buildings in the same district. That if granted, the variance will/will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of the Ramsey Zoning Chapter or other property in the R-1 Rural Residential District. That if granted, the variance will/will not substantially increase the congestion of public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially impair property values within the neighborhood. That the applied for use is/is not an expansion of the need for public services on the property. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: and the following abstained: and the following were absent: whereupon said resolution was declared duly adopted by the Ramsey Board of Adjustment this the ~ da3' of ,1994. Chairperson ATTEST: Ci~ Administrator