Laserfiche WebLink
Motion b~ Commissioner Bawden and seconded by Commissioner LaDue to recommend <br />City Cou4cil approval of the site plan for the proposed Hauser Properties building with <br />accesses a! proposed by the applicant. <br />Amendmo~nt by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Bawden to require <br />that the n~rtherly access on Cty. Rd. #83 have a south bound right turn lane and a north <br />bound by~ass lane and that 'no left turn' signs be posted in the north bound lane at the <br />southerly ~ccess. <br /> <br />Amendm ~e~nt carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Hendriksen, <br />LaDue, B~wden~ and Deemer. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Terry. <br />Motion c~ried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Hendriksen, LaDue, <br />Bawden a~d Deemer. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Terry. <br /> <br />Chmrman~Zlmmerman suggested that Jon Albinson request Anoka County to review the <br />proposed t[:affic pattern for the subject development. <br /> <br />Case #4~ Request For Sketch Plan Review Of Wood Pond Hills P.U.D.; <br /> '~ Case Of B.L.H. Development: <br /> <br />Commiss',~ner Deemer noted that he owns property adjacent to the subject property; he is <br />purchasin~ a small parcel of land from the developer that is not included in the plat; he will <br />participat{ in the case discussion and voting. <br /> <br />Mr. BanO;art stated that the proposed P.U.D. consists of 135 urban residential lots. In <br />addition t[v the 20% open space requirement of a P.U.D., City Staff is recommending <br />acquisitio~of a trail corridor and cash to satisfy park dedication requirements. <br /> <br />Paul Pearson of McCombs, Frank and Roos, was present representing B.L.H. <br />Developrr~ent. Paul stated that it is the developer's intent that 20,% open space be dedicated <br />as public ~.pace and not be included as a part of the homeowner s assoCiation. <br /> <br />Chmrman~Zlmmennan was not in favor of reduced sizes on those lots abutting Nowthen <br />Blvd. N.V~. because of their exposure to a major thoroughfare. Mr. Banwart indicated that <br />it was the [[teveloper s intent to utilize that property adjacent to a major thoroughfare for the <br />development of starter homes on smaller lots. <br /> 1, <br />The Commission proceeded to review the City Engineer s report dated February 27, 1990. <br /> <br />Mr. Banv~,art noted that when the MUSA boundaries were amended, the subject plat was <br />included ~the MUSA boundary, with the exception of the westerly portion of Outlot A. <br />Mr. Banv~hrt does not foresee any problems in obtaining Metro Council approval to have <br />the MUS~ boundary corrected to include all of the subject plati <br /> <br />Motion b~ Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Hendriksen to accept <br />the sketc~plan for Wood Pond Hills P.U.D. and recommend proceeding to the preliminary <br />concept aliproval stage as per the City Engineer's report dated February 27, 1990. <br /> <br />Planning & Zoning Commission/March 6, 1990 <br /> Page 5 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />