09/04/90 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Motion by Commissioner Hendriksen and seconded by Commissioner Bawden to table sketch plan review of Faye Addition until some of the outstanding issued can be resolved. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Bawden, Deemer, Hendriksen, LaDue, Terry and Thorud. Voting No: None. Mr. Chapman requested further guidance from the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding issues to be resolved. Commissioner Hendriksen replied that the future of Outlots A and B and the exchange of property with Anoka County should be resolved; the Commission should be provided with additional information regarding a previous proposal to expand within the airport safety zone area; the inconsistency of allowing multi-family dwellings versus single family dwellings in airport safety zone B; access to the Kelly property; and infringement on the 1000 foot commercial boundary south of Highway #10. Commissioner Hendriksen also stated that the Kelly property may exist under private ownership for another 20 years and it would not be logical to have a trail system that comes up to the edge of that property and stops. The issue of additional park dedication due needs to be resolved in the best interest of the trail future. Mr. Otto stated that the County is the implementing agency in this regional trail and the City should not be using its park dedication rights to acquire land for the County. Commissioner Deemer stated that he does not want to see multi-family residential developed adjacent to existing single family residential lots. Commissioner Hendriksen requested that when Faye Addition is brought before the Planning and Zoning Commission again, that City staff provide more information regarding airport safety zoning, especially with respect to permitting multi-family residential development on Zone B and more information on the State Model Ordinance for airport zoning. Case #6: Request for a conditional use permit to establish a yard waste compost facility; case of Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc. Mr. Merland Otto recalled that in January of 1990, Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc. (WMMI) applied for a conditional use permit for a yard waste compost facility. At that time, the question was whether the development limitations on site "P" apply to yard waste compost facilities and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended tabling any action on WMMI's request until that question was addressed. That questions was addressed on March 22, 1990 by Metropolitan Council and it was determined to waive development restrictions as they apply to the proposed yard waste compost plan. WMMI has now resubmitted their request for a conditional use permit. City staff has prepared proposed Findings of Fact and drafted a proposed conditional use permit relating to the request. Mr. Otto stated that a major concern is odor eminating from a yard waste compost facility. The Commission proceeded to review the proposed Findings of Fact. Motion by Commission Bawden and seconded by Commissioner Hendriksen that Item #36 of the proposed Findings of Fact indicate that the proposed use will not be unduly dangerous. Further discussion. Commissioner Hendriksen questioned how a yard waste compost facility could not be unduly dangerous when FAA has determined that landfill activity and airports are incompatible land uses. Commissioner Deemer replied that the State has indicated that yard waste is not landfill material by their lifting of the development limitations. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Bawden, Deemer, LaDue, Terry and Thomd. Voting No: Commissioner Hendriksen. Motion by Commissioner Terry and seconded by Commissioner Hendriksen that Item #37 of the proposed Findings of Fact should indicate that the proposed use will adversely impair the use and market value of surrounding property. Planning and Zoning Commission/September 4, 1990 Page 8 of 14