Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6.That the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pursuant to Section 9.03.03 of <br />the City Code on April 7, 2005 and said public hearing was properly advertised, and the <br />minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated by reference. <br /> <br /> <br />7.That on April 7, 2005, the Planning Commission recommended that City Council deny the <br />preliminary plat for the following reasons: extended cul-de-sac length, traffic concerns, <br />uncertainty of Potassium Street right-of-way and resolution of same may impact the <br />proposed development, density transitioning concerns, and outstanding issues contained in <br />the City Staff Review Letter dated April 1, 2005. <br /> <br /> <br />8.That on April 14, 2005, the Park and Recreation Commission recommended that park <br />dedication and trail fees be satisfied with a cash payment. <br /> <br /> <br />9.That on May 10, 2005, the City Council tabled action on the proposed preliminary plat <br />that had been revised since the April 14, 2005 Planning Commission meeting to provide <br />the opportunity for a future street connection to the south, which resulted in reducing the <br />number of units from 24 to 23. <br /> <br /> <br />10.That on June 14, 2005, the City Council directed City Staff to prepare findings of fact to <br />assist the City Council in their decision regarding the request for preliminary plat approval <br />of Rum River Estates. <br /> <br /> <br />11.That on June 14, 2005, the City Council authorized the City Attorney to initiate eminent <br />domain proceedings to acquire the right-of-way necessary to upgrade Potassium Street to <br />City standards, and the cul-de-sac that provides access to the dwelling units in Rum River <br />Estates would extend east off of Potassium Street. <br /> <br /> <br />12.That the presence of wetlands to the south and east and the existing development to the <br />north of the Subject Property prohibits the construction of the proposed cul-de-sac as a <br />through street. <br /> <br /> <br />13.That the presence of wetlands on the Subject Property presents challenges with respect to <br />platting standard single family lots in accordance with the dimensional and area <br />requirements established in Section 9.20.11 (R-1 Residential) District. <br /> <br /> <br />14.That the preliminary plat is proposing 59% private open space as part of the development, <br />which exceeds the 50% private open space area requirement established in the PUD <br />District regulations established in Section 9.20.31 of City Code. <br /> <br /> <br />15.That Section 9.20.11 (R-1 District) permits a density of up to 3 units per acre, or 4 units <br />per acre through the PUD process that includes townhomes; the preliminary plat is <br />proposing to plat 23 detached townhouse units on 10 acres for a net density of 3.3 units <br />per acre, which is in compliance with City Code. <br /> <br /> <br />16.That Section 9.20.11 (R-1 District) states that the R-2 Residential District performance <br />standard shall apply to townhouse PUD’s in the R-1 District, and the proposed plat <br />complies with all of the requirements except that separation between units is 5 feet <br />deficient of the 20 foot requirement. <br />RESOLUTION #05-07-229 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />