My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/13/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council - 03/13/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:09:25 PM
Creation date
3/9/2012 11:12:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/13/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 03/13/2012 <br />By: Tim Himmer, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />7. 6. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Consider 2012 Street Maintenance Program <br />Background: <br />Staff has been developing the 2012 Street Maintenance Program (SMP) for several weeks, and is seeking direction <br />from the Council on how best to approach maintenance activities for this construction season. In light of recent <br />discussions centered on long term road maintenance in the City, it has been difficult creating a program that would <br />be supported by the Council and community. Until a final decision is made on long term funding to achieve the <br />City's road maintenance goals there is limited funding available to complete all the scheduled improvements. <br />Attached is a map showing all the roadway segments that are due to receive some sort of maintenance treatment for <br />calendar years 2011 and 2012. As you can see there are approximately 74 miles of roadway needing work at an <br />estimated cost of $5,595,400, and the current budgeted amount for the 2012 SMP is $495,000. Further <br />complicating the situation is whether the Council is considering the elimination of assessments for maintenance <br />activities (sealcoats and overlays) and replacing it with another funding option. The current City assessment policy <br />has 2012 sealcoats at a rate of 15% of the total project costs, which are being phased out completely by the end of <br />2013, and overlays at a rate of 50% of the total project costs. If the Council is considering amending this policy it <br />is difficult to develop a program that can be supported by the residents if another option may be available in the <br />near future. The uncertainty of funding long term road maintenance activities, coupled with the City Charter <br />provision that allows counter -petitioning of projects by impacted residents, further intensifies the situation. <br />On February 14, during presentation of the case to consider a long term road maintenance policy, there was <br />discussion with respect to the 2012 SMP. With the notion being that a long term funding solution would be <br />forthcoming relatively soon with respect to future road maintenance it was discussed that this years SMP should <br />only include sealcoats, and consideration should be given to potentially eliminating the associated assessments. <br />There are several reasons why the idea of eliminating assessments for this year was considered; the current sealcoat <br />assessment rate of 15% is negligible compared to overlays and reconstructions, there was concern expressed by the <br />Council on how to retroactively respond to resident complaints associated with the shift in road maintenance <br />funding, elimination of the public hearing (429 assessment process) would save time and money, and it would <br />remove the ability for residents to counter -petition the improvements. <br />Based upon this preliminary feedback staff presented a case to the Public Works Committee on February 21, 2012 <br />seeking direction on how best to proceed with the 2012 SMP. It was the consensus of the Committee to initiate <br />a program that contained sealcoats only, and that the program should be tailored in a way that assessments would be <br />eliminated. Staff stated that they would prepare a program based upon their feedback and present the information <br />as a stand-alone case at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting, as opposed to being a report from <br />Public Works on the consent agenda. Staff has developed a program that meets those stated goals (see attached) and <br />only utilizes dedicated funding sources. <br />Observations: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.