Laserfiche WebLink
file for Resolution #86-167). <br /> <br />The first paragraph should read as follows: 'WHEREAS, the property known <br />as Gateway North Industrial Airport was purchased in Ramsey township by a <br />group of businessmen calling themselves the Anoka Industrial Park <br />Corporation in 1971. The airport was laid out in 1972 and consisted of a <br />soft-surface main and crosswind runway of 2,500' and 2,365' respectively.' <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Councilmember $orteberg stated that the resolution wording <br />'acquire and develop' implies spending money and he doesn't recall anything <br />being included in the budget for airport expenditures. Mr. Hartley stated that <br />the City is close to beginning the zoning or moratorium process; at the point <br />zoning or moratorium is implemented, the city is compelled, as the developer or <br />owner of airport property, to acquire any property to which development plans <br />are impacted because of the zoning. Mr. Hartley stated that Council is at the <br />point of making a substantial commitment and should recognize the fervor with <br />which the Airport Commission debated the issue and made their recommendation. <br />Mr. Hartley referred to funding and stated that acquisition costs would be 90% <br />State-Federal/10% local. If the City is forced into premature acquisition of <br />property, MN/DoT Aeronautics Division will provide for 2/3's of the cost if it <br />is generally known that the Federal Government has those funds available. When <br />Federal funding comes about, the City and State would be reimbursed the <br />difference between the amount they have each expended and the amount they are <br />required to spend when there is Federal participation. Mr. Hartley stated that <br />based on responses from the Federal Government, it is believed Gateway has an <br />excellent chance for being funded. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Schlueter and DeLuca. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />River's Bend Properties Resolution: <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley stated that Rick Foster and Lyle McLaughlin have requested that the <br />City consider exchanging a portion of an existing letter of credit for a <br />different letter of credit so that they can take the cash drawn down from the <br />first letter of credit to pay special assessments and taxes. The reason has <br />to do with language in the mortgage that the bank holds on the property and <br />project; for some reason the letter of credit is established at face value <br />in the mortgage which is an uncommon practice. Mr. Hartley stated that he and <br />City Attorney Goodrich have reviewed the request and the city's interest is <br />served if the developer's contract is fulfilled; he and Mr. Goodrich see no <br />problem in the letter of credit being represented by two letters of credit and <br />are recommending assisting Mr. McLaughlin and Mr. Foster in straightening out <br />their affairs at the bank. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg to adopt <br />Resolution #86-168, as prepared by the City Attorney, relating to the River's <br />Bend Plat letter of credit. (Please refer to resolution file for Resolution <br />#86-168). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Schlueter and DeLuca. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />~ Special Assessment Deferment: <br /> October 14, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 5 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />