Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Kiefer stated that he called the City Hall asking for copies of material that would reflect that tht <br />cost of service~ to the three units outside the project area was deducted from th:: total projent COSl <br />He has not yet been provided with those materials. <br /> <br />?\.1a\'or Reimann advised Mr. Kiefer to contact the City Administrator for the materIaL he l~ <br />requesting. Mayor Reimann inquired if the Rivlyn project qualifies for 50% City panicipation. <br /> <br />Mr. Hanley replied that whether or not the Rivlyn A venue project qualifies for 50% participation <br />on the pan of the City is a Council decision and it will set a precedent. Mr. Hartley:.id note that <br />Rivlyn Avenue was in a state of disrepair and had the sewer and water improvements not been <br />brought to that area, it clearly would have needed at least street reconstruction and would have <br />received 50% City panicipation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson stated that he thought there was a policy in place whereby the residents <br />would not be assessed until they connected to the services. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley replied that in January of 1990, the City Council passed an Ordinance setting a policy <br />whereby connection would be required when services are available and if services are currently <br />available, the properties have two years to connect from the date of 1990. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson stated that one of the property owners is an elderly couple and the <br />assessment would be a financial burden on them. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley replied that the State of Minnesota and the City of Ramsey provide for senior citizen <br />deferral of assessments. Deferred assessments accumulate interest and will be levied against the <br />property at some time in the future, but the property owner does not have to lose the property <br />because of the special assessment. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann inquired as to what amount would reflect 50% of the road construction ponion of <br />the project. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that 50% of the road construction would probably amount to $9,000.00. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Cich that the City will <br />participate in 50% of the cost for the portion of the Rivlyn A venue project relating to road <br />construction. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Mr. Kiefer stated that to fully satisfy himself, he would like to see an itemized <br />list of the properties to be assessed. <br /> <br />Jack Newcomb - 6301 Rivlyn Avenue N.W. - Mr. Newcomb stated that there was a revision in the <br />design plans for the utilities and inquired if the City subtracted the cost of the trunk lateral <br />connection from Front Street to where Rivlyn A venue is now built. Mr. Raatikka replied that the <br />cost has been deducted from the project cost. He stated that the amount will be recouped through <br />trunk costs and S.A.C.'s when people connect. <br /> <br />Mr. Keifer stated that according to his calculations, the project cost went over by 12% and <br />Minnesota has a law on the books that says any estimate over 10% requires notification to the <br />affected property owners. Mr. Raatikka replied that the City Chaner states that the assessment <br />cannot be more than 10% higher than the estimate quoted in the feasibility study. The actual cost in <br />this case is somewhat less than the estimate provided. <br /> <br />City Council Public Hearing / September 5, 1990 <br />Page 2. of 4 <br />