09/13/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Itawis Haugtved~ stated tha: he is affected by ',~ 3 would lose 40 nine and g~cer, ash trees i~ · Council proceeded to review' and diszuss the alignment features, safetx aspects, residenl displacemem and mx base impacts asso:iated with each of the proposed alignments. Mayor ReSmann and Councilmember Pete:son did not feel that the straightest alignment is necessarily the safest alignment. Councilmember DeLuca stated that the straightest alignment would best serve the purposes for constructing the road -- providing for the smoom flow of east/west traffi, and improving the response time for emergency vehicles; what is best for the City in terms of long range planning must also be taken into consideration. Mayor Reimann noted receiving letters from Harris Haugtvedt's attorney (James A. Reit. he:t) dated July 10, 1989 opposing all three ahernative alignments and from Bernard Wurm stating a preference for Plan A. Council proceeded to review the estimated project costs and Mr. Hartley explained the process used in appraising properties. Motion by Councilmember DeLuca and seconded by Councilmem~r Cich to select 2-E as the preferred alignmem on the east for the 153rd Avenue N.W. improvemen~ Proiec~ #8% 4; with the final decision on the route alignment to be 6ere:mined after completion of the environmental assessment worksheet. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Counciimembers DeLuca, Pearson and Cich. Voting No: None. Abstain: Counciimember Pete:son. Motion by Councilmember Pearson and seconded by Councilmemt:w~r Cich to select 1-A as the preferred alignment on the west for the 153rd Avenue N.W. Improvement Project #89- 4. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Cich and Pearson. Voting No: Councilmember DeLuca. Abstain: Councilmember Peterson. ~.@, Hartley predicted that the environment assessment worksheet regarding the proposed route alignments should be complete in September. Case #2: Request Of F&R Enterprises For An Open Burning Permit: 3,~. Goodrich recalled that after a lengthy discussion on June 22, City Council directed City Staff to draft findings of fact to consider denial of F&R Enge~rises' request for an open burning permit. Mr. Goodrich proceeded to review the proposed findings of fact with Cfiy Council. Mr. Paul Haik, attorney representing F&R Enterprises, was present and referred to Item #4 of the proposed findings of fact. Item #4 indicates that the subject property is 97 acres in size and Mr. Hail: noted that the open burn application would involve less than 1/3 of the City Council/July 11, 1989 Page 4 of 12