Laserfiche WebLink
bs burned." ~-i:ii ' ' v: <br /> :~11 Ll~( cxprca~cE ..... ,--' '~" ' Iht .. "~ ' <br /> <br />findings of fact. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodr.ri; recommended amending Item ~1 of the proposed findings of fac: to indicate <br />thc: the June 27 Open Bum .application will ~ attached thereto. <br /> <br />Mr. Hail: referred to Fire Chief Hoekc's re:mc, dated .lune 26 in which he indicams <br />concerns expressed by Anoka Fire Marshall Frecby and Eli.: River Fire Chief Anderson and <br />inquired as to when those discussions look place. <br /> <br />~,'h'. Hoeke sta'.cd that he discussed F&t-.'.'s application with Fire Marshall Freeby a~,d Fire <br />Chief Anderson on approximately June 24th or _StL <br /> <br />Mr. Hail: noted that hc met with P..amsev Ci:v Staff on June 26 regrading tile application for <br />an open burn and ,,,,'as provided a cop,,' of b/ir. t-Io~.ke s memo al thal time: there is no way <br />that Fire Chief Anderson and Fire Marshall Freebv could have men ful)v informed as to the <br />contents of the burn proposal on June 24 or 25. <br /> <br />/',ir. Hockc stated tha~ he explained the proposed site of thc burn, without going into <br />method details, to Fire Marshall Freebv and Fire Chief Anderson and tilex' indicated they <br />would not allow such a burn. Mr. Hoeke noted th::? both Fire Marsiml! }:re, aN,' and Fire <br />Chief Anderson are well aware of the proposed bum site and it's existing condi~ons. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich inquired if Mr. Hoeke fei: that Fire Marshall Freebv and Fire Ch;cf <br />Andersons opinon of the proposed bum would have been different had they known that the <br />actual burning was to take place in pits. <br /> <br />Mr. Hail: objected to speculating the opinions of Fire Marshall Freebv and Fire Chief <br />Anderson. <br /> <br />Mr. Ha'tley noted that with regard to ahernative methods for disposing of the trees, the <br />City did provide F&R with a list of woodchipper corm-actors that the City is aware of as a <br />result of it's involvement in a decentralized woodchipping pro,am. <br /> <br />Mn-. Haik requested that the proposed findings of fact also indicate that F&R applied for an <br />open burn pen-nit for the purpose of eliminating a potential fire hazard and for disposal of <br />trees, brush and vegetative matter in the, development of it's land. Also, tha~ F&R has <br />agreed that all burning would be conducted in accordance with Minnesota State Statute <br />7005.0750, subd. 2. <br /> <br />ix,k. Haik referred to previous comments by Mr. Banwan regarding DNR and MPCA visits <br />to the proposed burn site and noted that D~"P, and MPCA conm~ents are generally thoughts <br />about thc site and not specific evaluations of any application submitted to those respective <br />agencies. <br /> <br />Mr. Haik referred to the main concerns expressed by the City relating to the proposal for an <br />open burn. Mr. Haik stated that a reasonable plan has been formulated to address the <br /> <br />City Council/July 11, 1989 <br />Page 5 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />