Laserfiche WebLink
Enterprise Park to Crooked Lake 115 kV Transmission Line March 2012 <br />Environmental Assessment <br />route selected, including existing subsurface features and available ROW. Manholes <br />placed along the route would be used to pull conductors through the duct system. <br />Open cut trenching is the most commonly used construction technique to install <br />underground duct systems. Depending on the natural features in the right-of-way, it may <br />be necessary to shore up the trench for worker safety, dewater the trench due to the <br />presence of shallow groundwater, and backfill the trench with selective fill material to <br />improve heat transfer. Installation generally includes direct burial in backfilled trenches <br />and concrete trenches with covers or concrete ductbanks. Constructing the trench for the <br />underground transmission line would likely result in greater temporary construction <br />impacts than the proposed overhead line. <br />In general, construction of underground transmission lines takes longer than construction <br />of overhead transmission lines. A typical progression rate for underground construction <br />would be 200-feet of transmission line per day. <br />Background research and engineering and design considerations are required before <br />construction of underground transmission lines. Prior to construction of underground <br />transmission lines, the Applicant would conduct soil sampling and testing to determine <br />the thermal conductivity of the earth and ability to trench and bore in the ROW. <br />An underground transmission line is expected to cost five times more per mile compared <br />to construction of an overhead transmission line, due to time, materials, process, and the <br />use of specialized labor. An underground transmission line must also be routed to avoid <br />other underground installations such as water, gas, and sewer lines. Unstable slopes, <br />hazardous material sites, wetlands, and bedrock must be avoided. Going under a road, <br />highway, or river requires construction techniques, such as directional boring, that are <br />more expensive than overhead installations. <br />Although failure of underground transmission lines is rare, a disadvantage of building <br />underground transmission lines is the difficulty of finding and repairing failures. <br />Overhead failures can usually be found through visual inspection. The time and cost to <br />repair an underground transmission line would be greater than those anticipated for an <br />overhead transmission line. While overhead transmission lines fail, on average, once <br />every 17.8 years, underground transmission lines fail once every 50.5 years. In addition, <br />the average time to resolve a failure on an overhead transmission line is nine hours. The <br />average time to resolve a failure on an underground transmission line is three weeks. <br />No routine maintenance or operation costs are anticipated for underground transmission <br />lines. Visual inspections of underground transmission lines are not possible and will not <br />be conducted. Unlike overhead transmission lines that are susceptible to a number of <br />sources of outages (e.g., weather, birds, vehicle impacts), underground transmission lines <br />are susceptible to only two outage causes: cable fault due to overloading of the system <br />and failure of the cable or splices. If a fault is sensed on the transmission system, the <br />underground transmission line will need to be accessed. <br />21 <br />