My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/10/1989
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1989
>
Agenda - Council - 10/10/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 11:46:56 AM
Creation date
11/26/2003 10:33:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/10/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />13. <br /> <br />14. <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />17. <br /> <br />That F & R proposes to dispose of the damaged trees and dead <br />tress on the site by burning them in two pits which would be <br />approximately 40 - 60 feet in length and width and <br />approximately 10 - 12 feet in depth. <br /> <br />That F & R proposes to locate each of the pits at least 600 <br />feet from any residential dwelling. <br /> <br />That F & R testified that each pit would be constructed so as <br />to have earth berms around them in order to reduce fire <br />contact with wind and prevent visibility of the fire from <br />roadways to avoid traffic slow-downs by on-lookers. In <br />addition, the earth material in the berms could be used to <br />smother the fire if it becomes necessary. <br /> <br />That F & R proposes to place a 1200 gallon water tanker at the <br />Site together with two portable fire extinguishers to assist <br />in putting out any fire that might escape from the pits. <br /> <br />That F & R estimates that there are between 175 and 250 tandem <br />trailer truck loads of trees to be disposed of. <br /> <br />That F & R testified that smoke from the fires would not be <br />a problem because the trees are extremely dry and the <br />resulting fire will therefore be a hot and clean fire. <br /> <br />That F & R testified there are no other reasonable alter- <br />natives to burning the trees because: (1) chipping is not <br />practical because of the number of man hours required and at <br />F & R's direction, the trees have been bulldozed into piles <br />therefore exposing them to sand and gravel which poses a <br />problem for chipper blades, (2) exporting the trees off site <br />is not reasonable because of the volume and the related <br />disposal and hauling fees, and (3) burying of the trees is not <br />feasible because this would interfere with subsequent <br />development of F & R's.propert~. <br /> <br />That F & R estimates the burning could be completed in seven <br />(7) days, burning during daylight hours only. F & R would <br />cause the pits to be under observation 24 hours per day. <br /> <br />That F & R estimates that each pit could burn 2 - 4 truck <br />loads of trees at a time. <br /> <br />That F & R's property lying east and east and north of and <br />adjacent to the Site is also a pine forest which has numerous <br />dead pine trees which trees have died as a result of drought <br />and Pine Bark Beetle Disease. These trees are extremely dry <br />and in addition, the pine needles below these trees on the <br />ground are dry and pose a great fire potential. <br /> <br />That airborne sparks from the fire in the pits could ignite <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.