Laserfiche WebLink
c^s <br /> <br /> SPACE NEEDS FOR 1990 <br />By: David R. Hartley, City Administrator <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />In 1990, the City of Ramsey has budgeted funds for establishing an engineering function <br />consisting of four additional personnel. Additionally, the Public Works Department has been <br />experiencing an on-going need for additional space and improved facilities. For some time now, <br />the Cily Council and City Staff have been discussing this matter and exploring alternatives, It <br />would appear lhat there are some short term solutions to lhe space needs as well as the longer <br />term solutions. <br /> <br />The short term solutions involve finding space to accommodate the upcoming staffing changes and <br />the long term solutions involve the construction of a Public Works facility and additional space <br />to meet future staffing needs. In addition to the brick and mortar solutions, we also need to look <br />at the financing solutions. The Legislature, in its last session, amended the Minnesota Statutes <br />to allow cities to finance capital purchases through installment purchase contracts which are <br />obligations of the issuer and which need not be subject to annual appropriation. This amendment <br />will now permit a wide variety of projects to be financed which may have been impossible in the <br />past. <br /> <br />Historically, most public buildings were financed by general obligation bonds issued under the <br />authority of Minnesota Statute 475. This type of bond issue requires voter referendum <br />approval and is limited by the net debt limitation to 2% of the City's market value. <br /> <br />In the early 80's, municipal lease purchase financings began to be used as an alternative to G.O. <br />Bonds. Because leases are not general obligation bonds, projects could be undertaken without <br />prior vote of approval and with price tags above the net debt limit. Lease financings, however, <br />have three major shortcomings. The first is that they cannot carry the City's general obligation <br />pledge and requires a slightly higher interest rate. The second is that they must be subject to <br />annual appropriation where the City Council can annually decide to renew the lease or to walk <br />away from the project. (This makes lease financings workable for only essential purpose <br />projects like city halls and fire stations, where the likelihood of abandoning the building is <br />remote.) Finally, since leases are not bonds, levies to pay this debt are limited by levy limits. <br /> <br />Installment purchase financings avoid the first two limitations. As obligations of the City, the <br />inlerest rates will be comparable to the City's G.O. Bonds. Since projects can no longer be <br />abandoned by non-appropriation, less essential projects like recreation centers, public works <br />facilities or meeting halls become possible. <br /> <br />The levy limit constraint is overcome by having the City's economic development authority <br />issue revenue bonds for the project and then selling the project to the City through an <br />installment purchase contract. Since taxes are levied to pay principal and interest on bonded <br />indebtedness paid to another political subdivision of the State (the EDA in this case), levies can <br />be special levies and are not subject to levy limitations. <br /> <br />In conclusion, the City now has the financial tools to make the needed improvements to facilities <br /> <br /> <br />