Laserfiche WebLink
broader base for review of socio-economic concerns and health risk <br />assessment. <br /> <br />Three possibilities arise for the Council: <br /> <br />1) interview and select the consultant you believe is most qualified <br /> and which Council feels most comfortable with; <br />2) search for other firms; and <br />3) use a team approach giving primary responsibility to each <br /> firm in their particular strong areas. <br /> <br />A possible <br />be: <br /> <br />breakdown of primary responsibilities under concept "3" would <br /> <br />Wcnck Associates <br />Hydrogeologic <br />Surface waters <br />Long term care and monitoring <br />Leachate composition <br />Liner evaluation <br />Site development & layout <br />Leachate management <br /> <br />RMT <br />Air quality <br />Site design & construction <br />Engineering cost <br />Cost effectiveness/life cycle value <br />Gas management <br />End use <br /> <br />DPRA <br />Socio-economic impacts <br />Health risk assessment <br />Nuisance factors <br />Alternatives to the proposed action <br /> <br />On the more community based compatibility issues we would propose to <br />use Hakanson Anderson. Their areas of primary responsibility would be: <br /> <br />Land use compatibility <br />Traffic <br />Airport <br />Visual impacts <br /> <br />In addition, areas of secondary responsibility would be assigned to other <br />team members as appropriate. We would propose that Merland Otto serve <br />as overall coordinator of the consultant effort. <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br /> <br />