My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/13/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council - 08/13/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:36:06 AM
Creation date
10/25/2013 4:02:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/13/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
868
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ramsey, Nowthen, St. Francis, Oak Grove, and Bethel, Minnesota <br />Feasibility Study for Shared or Cooperative Fire and Emergency Services <br />Averages should be viewed with a certain amount of caution because the average measure can be <br />skewed if an unusual data point, known as an outlier, is present within the data set. Depending on the <br />sample size of the data set, this skewing can be either very large or very small. <br />As an example, assume that a particular station with a response time objective of six minutes or less had <br />five calls on a particular day. If four of the calls had a response time of eight minutes while the other call <br />was across the street and only a few seconds away, the average would indicate the station was <br />achieving its performance goal. However, four of the five calls, or 80 percent, were beyond the stated <br />response time performance objective. <br />The reason for computing the average is because of its common use and ease of understanding. The <br />most important reason for not using averages for performance standards is that it does not accurately <br />reflect the performance for the entire data set. <br />With the average measure, it is recognized that some data points are below the average and some are <br />above the average. The same is true for a median measure which simply arranges the data set in order <br />and finds the value in which 50 percent of the data points are below the median and the other half are <br />above the median value. This is also called the 504h percentile. <br />When dealing with percentiles, the actual value of the individual cata does not have the same impact as <br />it did in the average. The reason for this is that the percentile is nothing more than the ranking of the <br />data set. The 90`h percentile means that 10 percent of the data is greater than the value stated and all <br />other data is at or below this level. <br />Higher percentile measurements are normally used for performance objectives and performance <br />measurement because they show that the large majority of the data set has achieved a particular level <br />of performance. This can then be compared to the desired performance objective to determine the <br />degree of success in achieving the goal. <br />For this analysis, ESCI was most interested in the ability to respond the appropriate resources to the <br />highest percentage of incidents. For this reason, ESCI analyzed NFIRS data from each department for <br />2011 and 2012 and generated average and 90`h percentile response performance for emergency <br />incidents only. <br />page 62 <br />.emergcnry Semriccs Cansulang <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.