My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/13/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council - 08/13/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:36:06 AM
Creation date
10/25/2013 4:02:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/13/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
868
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ramsey, Nowthen, St. Francis, Oak Grove, and Bethel, Minnesota <br />Feasibility Study for Shared or Cooperative Fire and Emergency Services <br />For this study area, this would involve altering the methodology for calculating the cost of serving the <br />region. A formula for apportioning service cost may factor in assessed valuation, population (residents <br />and employees), service demand, level of service, and area size. One option for leveling cost fluctuations <br />is to employ a formula using multiple factors (population and assessed valuation, for instance). <br />What follows is an alphabetical listing of system variables that can be used (singly or in combination) to <br />allocate cost between allied fire departments. Each option is summarized by the concept, its advantages <br />and disadvantages, and other factors that should be considered. Regardless of the option(s) chosen to <br />share the cost of fire protection, the resulting intergovernmental agreement needs to address the issues <br />of full cast versus marginal cost and should be clear about the irdusion of administrative or overhead <br />cost. In addition, service contracts often must reconcile the exchange of in -kind services between the <br />participating agencies, if any. <br />Area <br />Concept: <br />The cost of emergency service can be apportioned based on the geographic area served relative to <br />the whole. For instance, the jurisdictional boundaries of the region represent approxima:ely 124.57 <br />square miles. Allocation based on area would apportion about 23.8 percent of cost to the City of <br />Ramsey (29.7 square miles), 28.2 percent to the City of Nowthen (35.1 square miles), 28.2 percent <br />to the City of Oak Grove (35.1 square miles), 19 percent to the City of St. Francis (23.7 square miles), <br />and 0.8 percent to the City of Bethel (0.97 square miles) Apportionment founded ❑n service area <br />alone may work best in areas that are geographically and developmentally similar. <br />Pro: <br />Service area is easily calculable from a variety of sources. <br />Con: <br />Service area does not necessarily equate to greater risk or to greater workload. <br />Consider: <br />Service area may be combined with other variables (assessed value and number of emergencies) to <br />express a compound variable (such as assessed value per square mile and emergencies per square <br />mile). <br />4 • Emergency Seevi ers Consul <br />page 87 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.