My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/13/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council - 08/13/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:36:06 AM
Creation date
10/25/2013 4:02:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/13/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
868
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ramsey, Nowthen, St. Francis, Oak Grove, and Bethel, Minnesota <br />Feasibility Study for Shared or Cooperative Fire and Emergency Services <br />Taxable Capacity <br />Concept: <br />The tax capacity of municipalities is established by the local tax assessor under laws of the state. <br />Usually, higher -valued structures and complexes carry a greater risk to the community from loss by <br />fire; consequently, assessed value also tends to approximate the property at risk within a <br />municipality. Fire departments are charged with being sufficiently prepared to prevent property loss <br />by fire. Therefore, the cost of contracted fire protection may be apportioned relative to the assessed <br />value of the allied jurisdictions. Typically, tax capacity is used to apportion cost of shared service by <br />applying the percentage of each partner's tax capacity to the whole. <br />Calculation of applying tax capacity to the study are results in the following: The City of Ramsey <br />would pay about 54.3 percent, the City of Nowthen would pay 7.8 percent, the City of St. Francis <br />would pay 20.3 percent, the City of Oak Grove, 15.9 percent and the city of Bethel, 0.8 percent. <br />Pro: <br />Tax capacity is updated regularly helping to assure that adjustments for changes relative to new <br />construction, annexation, and inflation are included. Because a third party (the assessor) establishes <br />tax capacity in accordance with state law, it is generally viewed as an impartial and fair <br />measurement for cost apportionment. Fire protection is typically considered a property -related <br />service and, thus, apportionment tied directly to property value has merit. <br />Con: <br />Tax capacity may not reflect the risk associated with certain exempt property, such as schools, <br />hospitals, universities, government facilities, churches, and other institutions. Tax capacity may also <br />not always represent the life risk of certain properties, such as nursing homes or places of assembly, <br />which might dictate more significant use of resources. In addition, some large facilities may seek <br />economic development incentives through tax capacity exemptions or reductions. Adjustments may <br />need to be made to tax capacity if such large tracts of exempt property in one jurisdiction cause an <br />imbalance in the calculation. Finally, tax capacity typically includes the value of land, which is not <br />usually at risk of loss by fire. Depending on the local circumstance, however, this may not be a <br />significant factor if the relative proportion of land value to structure value is reasonably uniform <br />over the whole of the territory. <br />page 88 <br />*.:1Ertisrgesicy Se <br />es Co nsuh mg <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.