Laserfiche WebLink
Metro Loca/ Water Management Task Force Report Dec~mber 15, '/989 <br /> <br />IV. Summary of Testimony <br /> <br /> The following is a brief overview of the formal testimony and written input con- <br />sidered by the Task Force: <br /> <br />Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization (VLAWMO) <br /> <br /> A presentation was given by Mr. James Johnson, VLAWMO president. The <br />VLAWMO involves six cities and was founded in 1983. Four meetings were re- <br />quired to draft a joint powers agreement. Mr. Johnson emphasized that the VLAW- <br />MO board was actively involved with the planning process tn order to maintain <br />control over the plan. He further stated that the involvement of local and state agen- <br />cies in the planning process was essential. The administrative budget for the VLAW- <br />MO was $5,000.00 last year and was provided by the member mumcipalities <br />according to the formula: 20% by population, 40% by valuation, and 40% by area. <br />Projects are paid for by the cities that they serve. All members of the VLAWMO <br />serve without compensation. <br /> <br /> M. Johnson reported that the member municipalities are now completing their <br />local water plans. He also stated that "509" has worked in the VLAWMO, and that <br />interlocal communication between the cities has improved a great deal. <br /> <br />Credit River Watershed Management Organization (CRWMO) <br /> <br /> A presentation was given by James Robinette, CRWMO president. It is a primari- <br />ly rural WMO consisting of four cities and three townships. They have completed <br />their plan, but have not yet received state approval. Robinette stated that the <br />Metropolitan Water Management Act is great because it causes people and <br />municipalities to get together to discuss their joint problems. He said that the <br />primary problems in starting the WMO were local animosities and the question of <br />funding the planning process. The limited statutory authorities of townships limited <br />their ability to obtain funds. The cities provided the money to get the planning <br />process started. <br /> <br /> Robinette reported that the lack of early direction on WMO plan content was one <br />of the biggest battles in the planning process. Another problem was dealing with <br />farmers in the CRWMO who won?, accept conservation regulations. He also stated <br />that there were flaws with the "509 law: it doesn't mandate a deadline for the com- <br />pletion of the local plans; townships need a better way to get money; better guidance <br />on the plan requirements is needed; and staff is needed for the state agencies to <br />allow the review of plans in a time]), manner. Robinette also felt that there still ex- <br />ists a "vast area of disagreement" among different people about how far a WMO plan <br />must go. <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br /> <br />