Laserfiche WebLink
Committee had made a recommendation in this case. <br /> <br />Councilmember Reimann stated that the recommendation has been put back into <br />Committee. <br /> <br />Councilm~mber Cox stated that the subject recommendation was made during the <br />cease and desist order. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman stated that he doesn't understand how the cease and desist order <br />would have an affect on the recommendation; that he see's no point in <br />prolonging this case and would like to address it this evening. Mayor Heitman <br />stated that he recalls that on April 9 a motion was passed to table the case <br />until this April 16 meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmamber Reimann stated that the Personnel Committee discussed Ms. <br />Norris' case at the last Personnel Committee meeting but no definite decision <br />was arrived at. <br /> <br />Councilmember Sorteberg stated that he doesn't recall that the Personnel <br />Committee discussed Ms. Norris' case. <br /> <br />Councilm~nber COx stated that he doesn't recall the motion that was made on <br />April 9, but his intent was to send the case back to the Personnel Committee; <br />the only recommendation made was during a cease and desist order and now the <br />issue can be discussed more openly. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that during a cease and desist order, no <br />negotiations with Staff regarding salaries may transpire to allow time for a <br />hearing and vote. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman inquired as to what new revelations there could be since the <br />cease and desist that would change the past recommendation endorsed by <br />Planning and Zoning and Economic Develot~nent Commissions. <br /> <br />Councilm~nber Cox replied that it is for the Personnel Committee to determine. <br /> <br />Councilmember Reimann stated that he feels the addition of another Staff <br />member should be reviewed because of the ramifications of a union be <br />established; it should be addressed whether or not the City can afford, into <br />the future, the addition of this person and position. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman stated that the addition of this position is not a new issue and <br />questioned if these points were not addressed before the decision was made to <br />proceed. <br /> <br />Councilm~ber COx replied that now there is a union and it is a new issue. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman stated that he is looking for a good reason why this case should <br />be referred back to the Personnel Committee. <br /> <br />Councilm~mber Cox told Mayor Heitman to do as he pleases in this case. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman replied that this is a council of 5. <br /> <br />Councilnmmber COx repeated that there was a motion passed on April 9 to put <br /> April 16, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />