Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember DeLuca stated that he is in favor of perimeter frost footings <br />and feels they are a necessity in commercial and industrial areas. <br /> <br />Case ~5'. Adopt Ordinance Adopting 1985 Uniform Buildin'g Code Aqd 1987 <br /> State Building Code: <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg to <br />adopt Ordinance #87-3 adopting the 1985 Uniform Building Code and 1987 <br />State Building Code. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Building Official Erickson stated that both of the <br />codes have minor changes in them; the UBC has a fee schedule change; both <br />the SBC and UBC require charging 65% of the building permit fee for plan <br />check versus the flat $30 rate currently charged for residential permits. <br />Mr. Erickson stated that he recommends continuing with the 1979 fee <br />schedule and increasing the plan review fees to 45% of the building permit <br />fee and gradually work up to the 65% figure. Councilmember Cox inquired if <br />the State is mandating these increases. Mr. Erickson replied that the <br />State is not mandating the change in fee schedules but is requiring that <br />plan checks be charged at a rate that is 65% of the building permit fee. <br />Council expressed concern with the increase to the plan review fee, <br />especially in situations where there is construction of several units <br />identical in structural design but the plan review fee is charged several <br />times and real effort was only put into the initial of those plan reviews. <br />The City Attorney recommended that Ramsey begin charging at a rate <br />comparable to what other c i t ie s are charging . <br /> <br />Councilmembers Cox and Sorteberg restated their motion as follows: <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg to <br />adopt Ordinance #87-3 adopting the 1985 Uniform Building Code and 1987 <br />State Building Code and further, to retain the 1979 fee schedule and <br />increase plan review fees to 45% of the building permit fee. (Please refer <br />to ordinance file for Ordinance #87-3) . <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Reouest For Conditional Use'Permit To Use A Temporary <br /> Structure For Office Space'To-Sell Automobiles In 'T~ B~i' <br /> Busines's District: Case Of Mr'~ Larry Rudesill: <br /> <br />Mr. Rudesill was present and Ms. Norris stated that he is requesting a <br />conditional use permit to use a temporary structure for office space to <br />sell automobiles at 7009 Hwy. #10; auto sales is a permitted use in this <br />area. The Police department has recommended obtaining a letter from the <br />State stating that the temporary structure meets requirements for permanent <br />office space required by State statute. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Sorteberg and seconded by Councilmember Pearson to <br /> City Council/June 23, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 13 of 19 <br /> <br /> <br />